 | | Re: The use of type 5 lines for smoothing of objects.
|
|
"Don Heyse" <dheyse@hotmail.spam....away.com> wrote in message > >Perhaps we could solve the speed problem by inserting a comment before (...) This sounds possible. The only problem is that they all have to be inserted as comments because older (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: The use of type 5 lines for smoothing of objects.
|
|
Hmmm, Finally a use for the type 5 lines I've been ignoring :) (I have another - so far successful - way of drawing in those lines) (...) Well alot of this leads in a direction I've mentioned before. Which is adding strip and mesh info into the (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: The use of type 5 lines for smoothing of objects.
|
|
(...) I tend to agree with you. My suggestion to Travis was based on about 2 seconds of thought when I read his email. It occured to me that type 2 lines are used to denote hard edges so I mentioned the possibility of using them instead of type 5 (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: The use of type 5 lines for smoothing of objects.
|
|
(...) indicator (...) on (...) places (...) having (...) This looks indeed like a more general way to do it. A big problem however will be complex patterns on a face, like on a shield. There will be a lot useless checking, because for every edge in (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: bug report: "cert." list on tracker
|
|
(Please notice "follow-up"! ;-) (...) I'd be a good candidate for grumpy, myself... Or sleepy... Or sneezy, for that matter (I got some *really bad* allergies!)... Or Doc, maybe... ;-) Franklin (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: bug report: "cert." list on tracker
|
|
(...) I *like* this idea. How can I help? (...) I liked his "expedite evaluation: release or kill" option... ;-) Thanks, Franklin (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: bug report: "cert." list on tracker
|
|
(...) I understand. (...) And I apologize if I came across as ... grumpy. Or maybe sleepy or dopey. Anyway, I'll stick with my previously stated viewpoint: if there are primitives on the tracker, let's make it a priority to either certify them or (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: The use of type 5 lines for smoothing of objects.
|
|
(...) One thing that someone noted (I think it was Don Heyse) when I mentioned this was that it might be possible to instead check for the lack of type 2 lines of color 24 between two adjoining faces, and use this as an indicator that the two faces (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | The use of type 5 lines for smoothing of objects.
|
|
Hello people, this is my first post. A few weeks ago I mailed with Travis Cobbs and Lars Hassing about an algorithm I constructed to make objects look smoother. This can be done by using per vertex normals and smooth shading. The normals can be (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: bug report: "cert." list on tracker
|
|
Steve, I see these as two separate issues: 1. The new version of the n-4disc files. 2. New versions of previously-existing primitives being considered "subfiles". Issue #1 is a current example illustrating issue #2. (Previously, the "BFC" primitives (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: bug report: "cert." list on tracker
|
|
Franklin: Quit complaining and work on getting the unofficial primitives resolved! Then they won't affect other files on the tracker. Slapping a "hold" on them doesn't *really* resolve anything. Let's try it this way: Mark has made some changes to (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: The Ldraw future (was: Idea, using functions for some primitives.)
|
|
(...) I'd disagree with this. "Dithered colors" has been part of the "standard" LDraw package ever since I started playing with it. The only (minor/potential) problem with using dithered colors is that you have to stick the darned code for the (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: bug report: "cert." list on tracker
|
|
(...) Most of these "related files" *ALREADY* have correct dependencies, I'd wager. I know that I personally almost *always* use the relevant non-disc primitive whenever I use a disc primitive. (...) I agree 100 percent! (And I'll continue to (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
|
(...) Okay, this thread is way too old and I feel that I owe an explanation for my tardiness. I apologize to everyone who was looking forward to a usable prototype; I hope I didn't set expectations too high. Lately, I've been heavily involved in (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Type 5 lines at the edge of primitives [DAT]
|
|
(...) There are too many numbers in the 2nd cylinder line. Cut and paste error? Give this one a spin. I think what he's trying to show is the type 5 line where the 2 quarter cylinders meet. 0 1 16 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 1-4cyli.dat 1 16 0 0 20 0 (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: bug report: "cert." list on tracker
|
|
(...) I can see your point, but if we wanted the parts to have "correct" dependencies, then files specifically requiring the new versions would have to be treated differently. This mainly applies to BFC certification, where a new part requires the (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Type 5 lines at the edge of primitives
|
|
(...) I'm not following the problem with this one. Then again, I'm not sure where lines are supposed to be, and where they aren't--the construct is a bit abstract. (...) Hmm. The only way to avoid this problem is to not include the edge lines in the (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Idea, using functions for some primitives.
|
|
(...) No, please don't, I still use it! (And I can't believe I'm the only one). With friendly greetings, M. Moolhuysen. (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Idea, using functions for some primitives.
|
|
(...) here is my opinoin on this dos program we all use.. LEdit. pro's - its fast (faster then MLCAD ( sorry mike i just dont like it ) ) - easy to use -portable cons - use of 16 colors? (dont forget dithered based colors.) - yes 8+3 filename format (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Type 5 lines at the edge of primitives [DAT]
|
|
(...) lines (...) And then there is matching a sphere with a torus Which is demonstrated with this file. 0 1 16 0 0 0 78 0 0 0 -78 0 0 0 78 1-8sphe.dat 1 16 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 90 t04i1333.dat 0 (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: The Ldraw future (was: Idea, using functions for some primitives.)
|
|
I completly agree with Tim, with one exception. The Lego parts coming out now are especially complex and involve patterns and colors that extend beyond the original LDraw colors set forth in James's program. I think a relaxation of the hard coded (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Type 5 lines at the edge of primitives [DAT]
|
|
(...) Here is a model that demonstrates some of the problems with placing type 5 lines at the edge of the cylinder primitive. 0 1 16 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 1-4cyli.dat 1 16 0 0 20 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 -10 1-4cyli.dat 1 16 -20 0 20 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Idea, using functions for some primitives.
|
|
(...) By all means, a good discussion :-) (...) Here's how I see it. As a community we need to answer this question and act accordingly. What is the role of 'LDraw?' I see 'LDraw' as the file format and parts library, and its role is as a foundation (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Idea, using functions for some primitives.
|
|
Time to throw fuel on the fire. Why are we still latching ourselves on to the original dos LDRAW program. Isn't it time the LDraw community graduated to Windows/Mac based programs and let the DOS program fade away from usage. Much like other (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: bug report: "cert." list on tracker
|
|
(...) See below. (...) I only found six: (URL) far as "number of files impacted"... 1-4disc.dat has 50 "related files" 2-4disc.dat has 58 "related files" 3-4disc.dat has only three "related files" 4-4disc.dat has 97 "related files" peghole.dat has (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Idea, using functions for some primitives.
|
|
(...) Hi Mark, My two questions are: 1. How would behave the original LDraw program regarding this proposed extension? 2. How would you ensure meaningful polygon decomposition? In particular how would you ensure correct assembling of primitives and (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | PT Privileges Restored
|
|
FYI to all: Franklin's privileges on the Parts Tracker have been restored in full. Steve (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: bug report: "cert." list on tracker
|
|
Franklin, In your estimatation, how many files are waiting for fixed primitives to be certified? Right now, of the 77 primitives on the system, I count 7 as being fixes. Here's another viewpoint: Any primitive files in the PT system *should* have a (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Idea, using functions for some primitives.
|
|
(...) For a linetype to include a 'function' in it's definition, we'd need to figure out what 'language' the functions would be written in. It's a fairly wide-open proposal. More likely, we'll add specific curved-surface primitives[1] at some point. (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Type 5 lines at the edge of primitives
|
|
(...) Wow! This is so cool! These cooperating type 5 control points give us both first order continuity between the cylinder and the tangent plane, AND 2nd order continuity between adjacent cylinder parts. All with just a few small changes to a (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Type 5 lines at the edge of primitives
|
|
(...) Yeah; I actually posted a response to that thread suggesting just this. (...) Well, it's only a problem if you don't add another type 5 line to the edge. And I agree that it's probably rare. --Travis Cobbs (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Type 5 lines at the edge of primitives
|
|
(...) Cool! Glad I could help! And after looking at the discussion Don linked to, I'm wondering if a similar thing could be done for type 5s on cylinder edges - make the second test point on the plane where a rectangle would be if it was butted up (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Type 5 lines at the edge of primitives
|
|
(...) Well, I did as you suggested, and it solved the problem without introducing any new ones. I was also able to then visualize why it worked on a continuing sphere once I had it working. --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com) (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | bug report: "cert." list on tracker
|
|
Steve, There is a "bug" with the certification list on the tracker. It is considering any primitive listed in the tracker to be a "subfile", regardless of whether or not that primitive already exists in the field (i.e., has already been included in (...) (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Type 5 lines at the edge of primitives
|
|
(...) There was a discussion on this very issue in cad.dat.parts about 2 months ago. This one includes a link to a picture. (URL) don't think it was completely resolved though, as fixing it probably requires changing quite a few primitives and/or (...) (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Type 5 lines at the edge of primitives
|
|
(...) Hmm... Good point; I hadn't thought of that. But I'll have to check to be sure (it's hard to visualize). The way I currently have my sphere, the joins between the segments are always drawn either twice or not at all. If this does work, though, (...) (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Idea, using functions for some primitives.
|
|
I was thinking over this the other day, and thought maybe could be some sort of line type p that would work the same as the type 1 lines, but istead take a function instead of a piece. This would be for primitves that the drawing program replaces (...) (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Type 5 lines at the edge of primitives
|
|
(...) I'm not sure if I understand this properly - if the second "test" point is down the line where the cylinder joint (between two rects) would be if it was attached to a cylinder, won't that work? It'll mean the same line may occasionally be (...) (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Type 5 lines at the edge of primitives
|
|
I'm not sure if this has been discussed before, but I discovered a problem with the use of type 5 lines at the edge of primitives. The basic problem is that there is no way for the primitive to know which direction any attached polygons are going to (...) (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | numbers report
|
|
(URL) certified files. 28 files need admin review. 189 files need more votes. 287 have uncertified subfiles. 99 held files. (Total: 623) (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC codeguide?
|
|
(...) Mark asked me in email, which I think I deleted before I replied to him (sorry Mark!), a question about using INVERTNEXT. Here's the question (as best as I remember it), and the answer. Q: Can INVERTNEXT be used multiple times in a file, or is (...) (22 years ago, 3-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC codeguide?
|
|
(...) (URL) There's only one meta-statement, 0 BFC. It takes several different keywords/parameters/options. These options are: CERTIFY - use only on the first BFC statement in the file, which must appear before any linetypes 1-5. Indicates the file (...) (22 years ago, 2-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | BFC codeguide?
|
|
Does anybody have a code guide that list all the available BFC commands and how they can be used? (22 years ago, 2-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | ldraw.org's MOTM & SOTM Winners for April 2002 - Voting too!
|
|
Hi all, This months winners for LDraw.org's Model & Scene of the Month have been posted to: (URL) MOTM winner is Matt with a fine train engine titled simply "T2". Sounds ominous, doesn't it? Our SOTM winner is KACS (as he is known) with a remarkably (...) (22 years ago, 2-May-02, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !
|
| |
| | Re: ldvdmodeler report
|
|
Thanks for the report, I am currently also testing myself and found and fixed five errors allready, namely: 1. Exporting defaulted the working directory to the E:\ drive, which is my Data Partition but for many people non existent or e.g. a cdrom (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | ldvdmodeler report
|
|
Roland, Thanks again for contributing this program. Everything that you said works, works. My favorite feature is the real time control of the 3dwindow. I think Editing parts points was easy but I still havent quite masterd joint editing yet. I (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
|
(...) :p That animation is older than the minifig parts. As is the animated file on this page: (URL) (well, ok, that is older than *some* of the minifig parts). Steve (22 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems submitting upadeted versions of official parts?
|
|
(...) Actually, I have to say, Mark's been pretty darn patient. :) But thanks for sticking up for me and the parts tracker. Steve (22 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems submitting upadeted versions of official parts?
|
|
(...) Thanks. When I didn't get any response from the magnet and didn't see it in the tracker I was worried that it didn't get through. What were the problems with it? I also sent in 2560 some time ago and am now submitting a 3647. (22 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Digging up an old thread (was: The geometry of minifigs)
|
|
(...) I have started working on an improved arm part - and agree this will need to use a new number to aboid backward compatibility issues. I'll try and post work-in-progress here when I have something worthy of comment. Chris (22 years ago, 28-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
|
(...) Cool! I have no idea what the nature of the dispute is, but I do know that it must be an essentially thankless task to be the administrator of the parts updates and that it may seem like an anonymous task to be a parts author. I just hope (...) (22 years ago, 27-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LD4DModeler 1.0 Beta 1 now available
|
|
(...) Great I'm downloading now, It look too hard for me but I'll try it. Great piece of work. (...) (22 years ago, 27-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LD4DModeler 1.0 Beta 1 now available
|
|
Roland, On behalf of myself and other AFOL's thanks for writing this program! My first impression is that you spent a lot of time and effort developeing it. No problems to report with the installing on my winxp machine and your example projects look (...) (22 years ago, 26-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | LD4DModeler 1.0 Beta 1 now available
|
|
I've decided to put it up regardless of the slow software rendering, hope you all have Video HW acceleration :) Needed information can be found in the same place as the zip with the setup (1.3MB). (URL) you like it and give me lot's of feedback and (...) (22 years ago, 26-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems submitting upadeted versions of official parts?
|
|
(...) Mark, The only files I've seen from you are a couple copies of the magnet, and now an updated 24 tooth gear. I never did anything with the magnet, because I disagreed with the change you made. The 24 tooth gear arrived Monday, I haven't had (...) (22 years ago, 26-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems submitting upadeted versions of official parts?
|
|
(...) Hi Mark, Do NOT attempt to directly submit updated parts using your userid! Do NOT change part number to force submission! This would result in more work for the administrator. May be he would resent you. Do not press him. Nothing urgent. Be (...) (22 years ago, 26-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Problems submitting upadeted versions of official parts?
|
|
How do I go about submitting upadted versions of officail parts? I have sent a few to parts@ldraw.org, but have yet to see any of them appear on the tracker. Maybe they should have several people in charge of looking over parts submitted to this (...) (22 years ago, 26-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: old parts and getting officialized
|
|
(...) yea i bet half the ones i make now you guys would be like : NO WAY NOT HERE! but just for the heck of it, (URL) <~ go to parts but serously i devoted alot of time to parts, official lego ones but now.. uht uh no way (22 years ago, 26-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: old parts and getting officialized
|
|
(...) Hmm. I'm pretty sure those parts have not been looked at. (...) Email me at parts@ldraw.org. Tell me what you want your parts tracker userid and password to be. I'll get it set up. (...) Drat! Steve (22 years ago, 26-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | old parts and getting officialized
|
|
hey guys (steve, tim..) i gotta ask since ive been out of the group for like a year and a half, has any of my old parts ( (URL) ) been looked at / officialized yet? the ones i mostly have in mind are: the town suspention, (URL) 12 v motor, (URL) v (...) (22 years ago, 26-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: rebuttal...
|
|
Since I was appealed to in Franklin's email and post, I am adding my comments in reply to some of the posts here. Steve knows this, but it might not be public knowledge -- I do not get involved in the trenches when it comes to parts. Steve has (...) (22 years ago, 26-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Digging up an old thread (was: The geometry of minifigs)
|
|
(...) Note that it's probably not possible to make proper arms that are backwards compatible because of the hand placement on the ends. So we'd need to assign new id numbers to the arms... right? Either that or we break a few thousand files. It may (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: rebuttal...
|
|
(...) This is my second reply, covering some side points Franklin brought up. (...) Yes, that's true. There's one from January, two from February, and 12 from March. To be exact, there are 10 files which are currently waiting for admin review, and (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
|
(...) The main reason for suspending review privileges is simplicity - I just pulled all privileges. I hope we'll get this worked out quickly, and get back on the road. I *definitely* do not want to lose Franklin as a contributor; he is too valuable (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
|
(...) Please Steve, Motivate the suspension as a reviewer. Suspension as a submitter MAY be necessary to keep control. Suspension as a reviewer clearly ressembles a sanction. What posted review justifies this sanction? Best regards, Damien (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: rebuttal...
|
|
(...) I'm only replying here. I'm going to post two replies, one addressing the current issue, the second to address Franklin's charges against me. (...) I understand your position. I also pointed out to you that 'fixing' this problem would cause (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: rebuttal...
|
|
(...) Hello Franklin, Hello Steve, I pray so that you stay or return to concordance. I can not imagine LDraw without you. I am sure there is nothing personal so there must be a way back to a friendly cooperative work. The Part Tracker would have no (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | rebuttal...
|
|
(This is a copy of my reply to Steve...) Steve, As I mentioned to you on several occasions, I wanted to fix this problem with the mis-match of the pattern numbers. As I mentioned to you on several occasions, I am the type of person, who, when he (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
|
(...) Franklin, As I notified you via email, your privileges to submit parts and post reviews on the Parts Tracker have been temporarily suspended. This is a direct result of your actions in posting 3626bps4.dat and 3626bps6.dat. For the time being, (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [LCAD] plz help me fix 3626bps4...
|
|
As a result of off-line correspondence, I've uploaded the following: 3626bps4 - Minifig Head with SW Alien with Large Black Eyes Pattern 3626bps6 - Minifig Head with SW Grey Beard and Eyebrows Pattern This will solve the mis-match problem *and* (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
|
PS, As a reminder, we have to release a new version of the "old Ben Kenobi" face pattern, because there's a flaw with the version currently released to the field (the discs and non-discs for the eyes)... Franklin (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
|
(...) Steve, I asked you to fix the mis-match w/ the "Old Ben Kenobi" face pattern. You refused, claiming that having a "~moved to" file would add to "clutter". I've fixed it myself, by uploading a new pattern, the "Gasganno" face pattern, as a new (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker suggestion
|
|
(...) Thanks for pointing this out, Jacob. Just don't check the rest of the tracker's pages right away, ok? Steve (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Digging up an old thread (was: The geometry of minifigs)
|
|
(...) I would *love* it if someone were to redo the arms and hand with higher accuracy. :) Steve (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Digging up an old thread (was: The geometry of minifigs)
|
|
(...) I have had thougt about this and I also think this is worth to be taken over. But I don't have time to realize this. If no one has a something against this you could make realistic arm parts. CU Bernd (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker suggestion
|
|
(...) The HTML coding is not quite perfect. Take a look at (URL) get an idea about the problems. Jacob (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Digging up an old thread (was: The geometry of minifigs)
|
|
(...) Considering the accuracy to which the torso and arm parts are modeled... is it possible at all to do realistic poses (like an ABS minifig) without nasty gaps and collisions? I've had trouble doing this before, but only just realized how bad it (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker suggestion
|
|
(...) Try (URL). :) I'd been thinking about this for awhile, but it was usually tied in with a whole "My Parts Tracker" kind of page. Which I never put together. Getting the review information was relatively easy. Steve (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
|
(...) Yes; this one: (URL) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
|
(...) Help me out here - does Lobot have a decorated torso? Steve (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
|
(...) Franklin and everyone: Please do *not* attempt to 'rename' files on the Parts Tracker. I have a simple script set up to handle renames. If you upload duplicate of files under new names, you'll make more work for me, and add to the level of (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker suggestion
|
|
Yes, exactly what I mean. Access would be through the same password interface for submitting/reviewing. -Orion (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker suggestion
|
|
(...) Do you mean you'd like to have a list of reviews that you've posted? More precisely, a list of parts you have reviewed? Steve (22 years ago, 23-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: new rounded slopes...
|
|
(...) x464 - Slope Rounded 1 x 6 (URL) LMKWYT! ;-D Thanks, Franklin (22 years ago, 23-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Numbers Report
|
|
As of today, 23 April... Section Totals 213 certified files. 52 files need admin review. 236 files need more votes. 180 have uncertified subfiles. 98 held files. (Total: 779) (For comparison): (URL) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | [LCAD] plz help me fix 3626bps4...
|
|
Steve, I need your help to fix this problem. I need you to please re-number file 3626bps4 (the Old Ben Kenobi face pattern) currently in the Tracker to 3626bps6. Once this is done, I need a new file uploaded for a *new* version of 3626bps4, that (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
|
OK, as of today, here's what we've got... Please note that we *still* need some of the subfiles re-numbered... Thanks, Franklin For 3626b (Minifig Head): pS0 - (open) pS1 - (open) pS2 - Young Obi-Wan Kenobi (also Luke Skywalker from 2000 and later) (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
|
[sigh]... I just made *another* mistake. >:-( I forgot that I wanted to fix a mis-match, so I've just had to re-(re)-name the "Lobot" files. The *proper* versions are: 3626bpsc, s\3626psc1, and s\3626psc2. Any previous version is now obsolete, and (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
|
(...) Yes, it will. I made a mistake. I've manually changed these subfiles to more acceptable names: s\3626pSA1 and s\3626pSA2. Steve, please delete the old, obsolete versions of these subfiles. Thanks, Franklin (22 years ago, 23-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Parts Tracker suggestion
|
|
A smaal little suggestion for the Parts Tracker: Some sort of "what have I signed on to" page. This would make it much easier to find the parts that have a hold placed on it. -Orion (22 years ago, 23-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
|
(...) And that's how I renamed these files. parts\s\3626ps9a.dat ---> parts\s\3626basa.dat parts\s\3626ps9b.dat ---> parts\s\3626bbsa.dat Steve (22 years ago, 23-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
|
(...) Yes, but there is an acceptable alternative naming convention for patterned subparts (see How are subparts numbered? in (URL) ---> s\3626baS9 s\3626bpS9b ---> s\3626bbS9 etc. Chris (22 years ago, 23-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
|
(...) Yes, it will. Jacob (22 years ago, 23-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
|
"Franklin W. Cain" <fwcain@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GuzKxp.Gyy@lugnet.com... (...) whom? (...) Won't 9 letter filenames cause problems with LDraw? Dan (22 years ago, 23-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
|
[snip] (...) [snip] (...) [snip] (...) I just thought of something *easier*... Just re-number 3626bpSA to 3626bpSC (fixing the "Lobot"-face subfiles, accordingly, as well). Franklin (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
|
Should we document in the Pattern Number FAQ which codes we're using for whom? For 3626b (Minifig Head): pS0 - (open) pS1 - (open) pS2 - Young Obi-Wan Kenobi (also Luke Skywalker from 2000 and later) pS3 - Luke Skywalker (from the 1999 sets) pS4 - (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Wrapping up 2002-02
|
|
(...) Argh! That's a lot of part commentary to browse through... Oh well. I need to polish up my grep skills anyway. :) Steve (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Wrapping up 2002-02
|
|
(...) Maybe. OTOH, if we want to pursue this train of thought, it's now or never. Once these files get released, things are pretty much set in stone. And the number of characters should not be a deterrant. We just have to be clear about which codes (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Checking 48\1-4ring4.dat
|
|
(...) Wow. Just 4 seconds between the first and second review? Amazing. :) It's now re-certified. It's always amusing to watch the certified count jump when a single file is reviewed. Steve (22 years ago, 21-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Checking 48\1-4ring4.dat
|
|
(...) Done. Now we just need to get the file re-certified. I cast the first re-vote.... ;) Paul (22 years ago, 20-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
