Subject:
|
Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:57:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1394 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Chris Dee wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Daniel Crichton writes:
> >
> > "Franklin W. Cain" <fwcain@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:GuzKxp.Gyy@lugnet.com...
> > > Should we document in the Pattern Number FAQ which codes we're using for • whom?
> > > 3. Subparts should be re-numbered appropriately; i.e., by character:
> > >
> > > (Lobot):
> > > s\3626bpS9a ---> s\3626bpSA1
> > > s\3626bpS9b ---> s\3626bpSA2
> > > (*AFTER* re-numbering the main file, as stated above...)
> >
> > Won't 9 letter filenames cause problems with LDraw?
> >
> > Dan
> Yes, but there is an acceptable alternative naming convention for patterned
> subparts (see How are subparts numbered? in
> http://www.ldraw.org/library/tracker/ref/numberfaq/).
>
> s\3626bpS9a ---> s\3626baS9
> s\3626bpS9b ---> s\3626bbS9
And that's how I renamed these files.
parts\s\3626ps9a.dat ---> parts\s\3626basa.dat
parts\s\3626ps9b.dat ---> parts\s\3626bbsa.dat
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
35 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
