Subject:
|
Re: [Parts Tracker] Wrapping up 2002-02
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 14:49:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
571 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Franklin W. Cain wrote:
> I wouldn't mind renumbering the as-yet-unofficial torso patterns
> you mentioned. I do see a potential problem, however...
> There are just *so* *many* characters in SW that trying
> to co-ordinate the pattern numbers might already be a lost cause...
>
> Would the most rational decision, at this point, be to say,
> "the heck with it", and just leave well enough alone?
Maybe. OTOH, if we want to pursue this train of thought, it's now or
never. Once these files get released, things are pretty much set in
stone.
And the number of characters should not be a deterrant. We just have to
be clear about which codes we're reserving for which patterns/parts, and
which codes are open for "general SW patterns".
The actual renaming of files on the trackerwon't take very long.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: [Parts Tracker] Wrapping up 2002-02
|
| In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss writes: [a whole lot of info, which I've snipped...] Steve, I wouldn't mind renumbering the as-yet-unofficial torso patterns you mentioned. I do see a potential problem, however... There are just *so* *many* (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
