To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 7186
7185  |  7187
Subject: 
Re: The Ldraw future (was: Idea, using functions for some primitives.)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Tue, 7 May 2002 05:21:37 GMT
Viewed: 
484 times
  
I completly agree with Tim, with one exception.  The Lego parts coming out
now are especially complex and involve patterns and colors that extend
beyond the original LDraw colors set forth in James's program.  I think a
relaxation of the hard coded color restrictions in parts would benefit the
further expansion of the part library.

- Orion



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The Ldraw future (was: Idea, using functions for some primitives.)
 
(...) I'd disagree with this. "Dithered colors" has been part of the "standard" LDraw package ever since I started playing with it. The only (minor/potential) problem with using dithered colors is that you have to stick the darned code for the (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Idea, using functions for some primitives.
 
(...) By all means, a good discussion :-) (...) Here's how I see it. As a community we need to answer this question and act accordingly. What is the role of 'LDraw?' I see 'LDraw' as the file format and parts library, and its role is as a foundation (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

9 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR