To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 7188
7187  |  7189
Subject: 
Re: Idea, using functions for some primitives.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Tue, 7 May 2002 06:24:26 GMT
Viewed: 
505 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Orion Pobursky writes:
Time to throw fuel on the fire.
Why are we still latching ourselves on to the original dos LDRAW program.
Isn't it time the LDraw community graduated to Windows/Mac based programs
and let the DOS program fade away from usage.  Much like other programs, the
Dos version was just the start but bigger and better things are on the
horizion if we, as a community, drop the restrictions placed upon us by DOS
(to cite one example, the 8+3 filename limit).

- Orion

here is my opinoin on this dos program we all use.. LEdit.
pro's  - its fast (faster then MLCAD ( sorry mike i just dont like it ) )
- easy to use
-portable

cons
- use of 16 colors? (dont forget dithered based colors.)
- yes 8+3 filename format sucks (no long names)
- seing how we will quite possible NEVER see the source code, cant update it
- LEdits primary file to save is DAT, and not LDR unless stated.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Idea, using functions for some primitives.
 
Time to throw fuel on the fire. Why are we still latching ourselves on to the original dos LDRAW program. Isn't it time the LDraw community graduated to Windows/Mac based programs and let the DOS program fade away from usage. Much like other (...) (23 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

9 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR