 | | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) It may be bluntly stated, but frankly, if you are not here to work with all the members and users of Lugnet to make Lugnet a better place, I think you are in the wrong place. Take a look at the Lugnet plan for some of Todd's and Suzanne's (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) No misinterpretations, I was agreeing with your cite and following up. Sorry that my response was a little terse and may not have been as clear as it should be. Things are very lousy at work right now (in the next day or so I may have (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Nothing to do with a market for your MOCs on eBay.
|
|
(...) I'm not sure a machine with minifigs has been tried before. It would be cool. It's been done with small sets, though. Brisbane, Australia Airport: (URL) Mark Harrison in the pics) Hey, au'ers... are those machines still there at the airport in (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Nothing to do with a market for your MOCs on eBay.
|
|
That message doesn't have anything to do with the market of MOC's on ebay...not even a little. And neither does this post--HA HA! I guess while I'm writing, I might as well say something a teensy bit meaningful, even if it doesn't have anything to (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) This sentiment is not friendly. It is arrogant and has a stink of martiality. It really bugs me, I'm sorry to say. I am unlikely to do any of the above. (...) There has been insufficient restraint so far in the cause of 'correction'. The (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
"Frank Filz" <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:3C4DDAD7.148E@m...ing.com... (...) there is (...) of (...) have (...) Whoops.... I wasn't addressing you there. I was addressing Scott. Is that how you took it? If so, my sincere apologies. (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) Yes indeed. We all have a right and a responsibility to work to make LUGNET a better place. Lead, follow, or get out of the way. (...) Yes and here, I think, is a perfect example of this: (URL) line, the guidance is in with a lot of other info (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) I agree with you on almost all points made so far. I have been a LUGNET participant for several years now, and feel a difference in the community. I am ashamed at some of the instances of LUGNET "correction" that have happened in the past. I (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss...
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Duane Hess writes: <snip previous stuff> (...) <snip other previous stuff> Insert your favourite me too post here!!! Jude Too bad we cannot have a script added so Scott cannot reply to Larry. (25 years ago, 22-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) Interesting... I don't think this is the first time someone has quoted me under a mis-perception of my point. Perhaps I shouldn't be so polite in making my points, people seem to mistake my call for politeness and decency as a call for leaving (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss...
|
|
(...) Scott, Here is what I've taken from your post: 1. Larry is a twit because he missed the point (which was....?). 2. You want to point out that you are tired of Larry's attitude 3. You want to point out that you are tired of Larry's control over (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| |
| | Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) I wasn't going to get into this, but your post really makes me sick. I just read the thread history of this..... setting the Bricksmiths issue aside [1], I'd like to discuss the issue of community policing, and how it is a Good Thing(TM). (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss...
|
|
(...) You are completely missing the point. You are one of the "twits who actively undermine it with non constructive sniping". Read Brian's words addressed to you again (the ones you have deleted): ==+== My whole point was simply to point out that (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss...
|
|
(...) He was echoing the sentiment I expressed, I think. And when you look at your initial words (which I left, for reference while snipping all else away) on this topic, I think it was a fair sentiment. Stamping your foot and saying "so sue me" (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: member packets (continued)
|
|
(...) Well, I've been thinking about this suggestion.. As it stands right now, my posessions are packed away in storage, including the nearly complete packets. I just took a look around in there, but didn't see the box right away. If I did locate (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: member packets (continued)
|
|
(...) Is there anything that we could do to help make the membership packets happen? For instance, could we pitch in a few bucks to help with the cost? It might be cheaper if you had the membership cards, bookmarks, etc. printed at a professional (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: member packets (continued)
|
|
(...) Thanks for letting us know the story. Jude (25 years ago, 19-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | member packets (continued)
|
|
sorry.. I'm posting from a library with time-limited 'net use. (...) anyway... after separating last spring, Todd handed the things over to me. It was then that I found out that all document/graphics files had been lost at some time in the past. In (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | member packets
|
|
I'll make a more official post later, but for now, to put the mystery to rest... When Todd and I began LUGNET, years ago, the member pack was a fun project done in our spare time as an 'extra' thing for our new friends as they joined up. It was a (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron connection problem
|
|
(...) this is really not a LUGNET issue - I'll reply offline. Dan (25 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Peeron connection problem
|
|
A couple of days ago (right after the update announcement), I tried to download the inventory hosted at (URL) with Webstripper ((URL) I left the program running overnight, but it didn't manage to get the site downloaded even over a fast connection. (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Still no Membrship pack/ password
|
|
(...) The packets are more of a free bonus, really. Sort of a fun thing to get. And, I imagine, a lot of work to generate. (there's printing the stickers, printing the envelope labels, stuffing the envelopes etc. etc.) I expect there probably are (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Still no Membrship pack/ password
|
|
Dan, My membership has been active since last January. That's where this whole mini-rant started. Like I said earlier in this thread, if you need another pair of hands to send emails, I could help. I spend the daytime at home with my little boy and (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Still no Membrship pack/ password
|
|
(...) that you will get - the password will be emailed to you (if it hasn't been already) once the membership is activated. It has nothing to do with the membership packets. Dan (25 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Still no Membrship pack/ password
|
|
I agree, Scott. If we aren't going to get membership packs, someone should say so. I would think that whatever information is there could be morphed into a web page that could be accessed by members and not lurkers. I would like a password, though, (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Still no Membrship pack/ password
|
|
If it has not been done already, it sounds like a note needs to be put on the membership form saying that membership packs may be delayed (or may never come). As for those who are waiting for packs right now I think they need to be updated. I expect (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Still no Membrship pack/ password
|
|
(...) Oh, not even that. I'm #447 and I never got a packet either. :( ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head -- Mark's Lego Creations (URL) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Broken Monorail Motor
|
|
(...) Who said that? :-) (...) All kidding aside, and even though monorail is an orphaned product, does it make sense for them to have their own group? I dunno, which is why I ask. I can't remember, I may even have asked before about this. The three (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Still no Membrship pack/ password
|
|
Tanya, thanks for bringing this up again. I posted almost the exact same queston nearly a month ago and am still awaiting a response. My guess would be that the packets were made for the first 500 people and the rest of us just get to grin and bear (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Broken FTX linking?
|
|
(...) It works for me at work, under IE 5.00. It doesn't work for me at home, under IE 5.50, but I suspect that's because I don't have a newsreader installed on my home computer. What browser (and version) are you using? James (25 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Broken FTX linking?
|
|
(...) ... (...) This link: news:rec.toys.lego works fine for me. (opens the news client, etc.) This link: (URL) not work for me. Are you saying that this works for you? Cary (25 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Still no Membrship pack/ password
|
|
(...) I am 549 and still waiting. I know there are those that came before me that are also waiting. Let's face it membership kits will probably never happen again. Jude (25 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Still no Membrship pack/ password
|
|
Dear Suz et al, I have been waiting ever so patiently. I would like to make another $10 contribution to Lugnet, but it seems to me that I should hold off until I can at least see what my first $10 (that I sent last January) got me besides posting (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Broken FTX linking?
|
|
(...) ...and your browser is configured to open your news client when receiving a "news:" URL. In IE, choose Tools | Internet Options, choose the "Programs" tab, and select your news client in the "Newsgroups" field. ROSCO (25 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Broken FTX linking?
|
|
(...) For me (On IE 5.00), it attempts to open a newsreader, and resolve the group from the name list available from my news server. This fails, because I'm at work, and default to internal NNTP servers, which don't port through usenet groups. (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Broken FTX linking?
|
|
The FAQ entry: (URL) this FTX: ...favorite USENET newsgroups such as <news:rec.toys.lego>. ... I'm pretty sure this used to work. It resolves to: (URL) for me results in a 'page not found' page on IE. Other jump.cgi uses resolve fine. Cary (25 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?
|
|
Hi Larry, As an member of this community I would say thanks Larry !!! Keep up the good work, but if everyone every now and then made an remark, Larry wouldn't be the only one to do so. So if you're commenting Larry, look at yourself. LUGnet is (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
(...) Well, one thing you can do is when you DO see a MOC or other thing you like, spotlight it... (25 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL)
|
|
snipped due to some excess vulgarity (...) well.....please don't consider my words "ready to fight" but... I feel that there are certain instances where there has been a clear violation of the TOS and it took a while for the violater to be warned of (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL)
|
|
(...) Okay, how about people who simply (and perhaps naively) expect others to abide by the TOS they agreed to when joining LUGnet? Iain's and your posts were, at the very least, vulgar and innapropriate for this forum. (...) If their TOS do not (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
(...) perhaps we should reduce the bonus the .announce msgs get to their score? that way, "good" posts from other groups will be more likely to get to the spotlight - it's not meant to just show the recent announcements... Dan (25 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Words…
|
|
(...) No fighting, I haven’t even donned my flame-suit! :) I believe that I put it quite eloquently, talking about “creative anagram” usage, and “relevant content.” (...) Hey, I too agree with Tim, but I just wanted to provide context to the (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
I figured as much, it's just with less traffic in the .announce group the top ten list becomes stale quickly. jt (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
(...) I think that may be temporary, I'm just speculating, but BricksWest seems to be going through a phase where they have a lot to say. (25 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL)
|
|
(...) I am sorry Richard, but I think Tim is right in the way he asked Iain to refrain from using that language. It is not like he went and asked for a ban. He just let Iain know of the offensive nature of what was posted. Perhaps it was something (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL)
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Richard Noeckel writes: ... <snip> (...) Tired of it or not, this is still a site meant to be accessable to children, and I would prefer to be able to allow my children to read here (when they're old enough). Please honor (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL)
|
|
(...) Take it easy there *“TOY IN RECTUM” ;) We’re only discussing creative anagrams here. Anyway, Iian didn’t even create those… He’s just reiterating what the “Internet Anagram Server” concluded. (URL) the site is just plain neat, he wasn’t trying (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
Well now that the MOC posting have been "removed" from .announce it seems that that the Top Stories list on the main page as become the Brickwest Annoucement list. jt (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL)
|
|
"Rebel Transcanner" <hendryjr@oxford.net> wrote in message news:GpyALn.Jn9@lugnet.com... (...) Iain - Please refrain from using the above graphic language on LUGNET. It isn't appropriate, as the goal of LUGNET's administrators is to provide a fun, (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Market posts and TOS
|
|
(...) I agree, Frank. I'm working on eliminating the holdup now. Expect an announcement about this soon. -Suz LUGNET Admin (25 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Market posts and TOS
|
|
<rwebb@enohspamaltavista.net> wrote in message news:Gpxx64.3FL@lugnet.com... (...) for (...) Or perhaps lugnet.people-who-ac...ugnet-turn ing-into-usenet? At least that's what my post was. Taking the previous posts as a hypothetical situation and (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Market posts and TOS
|
|
Hi all I think I need to reply to this with more than "sorry". My first thought was that two words ought to suffice. But where's the proportion in all of this ? Yes, I've posted to the .market tree before, BUT have never really digested that (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Barcode Pilot #8479 - party time
|
|
(...) Apologies (25 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Market posts and TOS (was Re: Black Cat 5571 + 5563 + 5561)
|
|
(...) This is too bad. If he's been following LUGNET for this long, he does [most likely] know better. This is exactly the attitude we DON'T need on LUGNET - people flaunting the charters and disrespecting other groups for their financial gain. (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Market posts and TOS (was Re: Black Cat 5571 + 5563 + 5561)
|
|
This is a pretty good example of how telling people where to post stuff doesn't do much good. I don't know Ronan myself, but I think he has been around for quite some time. The People listing shows that he has been a lugnet member since 23-Nov-2000. (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Market posts and TOS (was Re: Black Cat 5571 + 5563 + 5561)
|
|
(...) I second this wholeheartedly. (...) Too bad its taken this long. It should have been changed a while ago. -Tim (25 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Market posts and TOS (was Re: Black Cat 5571 + 5563 + 5561)
|
|
(...) There has been talk for ages about changing the TOS to disallow market posts outside the .market hierarchy (presumably they would remain ok in org groups as those groups desire, and shopping tips would remain ok in the .loc groups), and Suz (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms) !
|
| |
| | Re: Redirecting posts (was: Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?)
|
|
(...) Being corrected in a public forum is somewhat disturbing to most people. On the other hand, getting one correction message is (I would think) less disturbing than getting many. The latter inadvertantly communicates a sense of the "in-group" (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Survey, new LEGO story. Check it out.
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, William R. Ward writes: ....and how the heck are all you west-coasters up already? Its early enough where I am (6:25), but you, Dave, and Richard all posted in the last half hour....have you not gone to bed yet? I'm getting (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Survey, new LEGO story. Check it out.
|
|
(...) Good point. My assumption was that he would see the thread going this way via the web interface, which keeps the whole thread on one page regardless of what groups it goes to. Can't be so certain though, so I send him a private copy just now. (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Survey, new LEGO story. Check it out.
|
|
(...) What is the likelihood that he will look in this newsgroup and see your reply? I hope you sent him a copy via private e-mail. Most people do not read the admin groups, I would venture to suppose... Especially those who are more likely to make (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Barcode Pilot #8479 - party time
|
|
I don't think these kinds of post should be posted on lugnet.technic. If so, can someone responsible please take whatever action is appropriate? Given the recent discussions here, I'm not sure what the appropriate action would be. Fredrik (25 years ago, 12-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Survey, new LEGO story. Check it out.
|
|
Matt - I do not believe this post belongs in lugnet.announce, for the same reason MOC posts were singled out and given a separate group. Here's quoted from the charter: "NOTE: the following are not appropriate: auction announcements, commercial (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?
|
|
You did the right thing IMHO. How would a beginner know if he´s posting to the right place otherwise? Anyone can make a misteak[1], but they need to now about it, so they can avoid it. [1] This is, I believe the correct spelling.. =) /Joakim "Larry (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Redirecting posts (was: Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?)
|
|
(...) I agree you have a point. But do you think the current system leaves users feeling any less harassed? Scott A (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Redirecting posts (was: Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?)
|
|
(...) This is a good idea. Is this something the curators (where they exist) can do? Scott A (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?
|
|
(...) I don't have an answer for you. You might search for previous messages from Todd or Shiri, see how they handle it. Steve (25 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Redirecting posts (was: Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?)
|
|
(...) Or 2b. Poster receives 10--20 e-mail messages telling him that he's wrong (many probably more caustic than would have been posted in public) because no one is sure that someone has corrected him. 3b. Poster feels harassed. 4b. Poster gives up (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Redirecting posts (was: Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?)
|
|
(...) Some of my thoughts: - I'm glad to see some acknowledgement that the "policing" needs to be done by more than just one or two (or three or four) admins. - With multiple people posting reminders, an advantage of posting over e-mail is less (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Redirecting posts (was: Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?)
|
|
(...) I do not agree that we have a climate where people are being chastised. I've only really seen it happen to one person. (...) I think we need to be more subtle. I'm old enough to remember a phase of LUGNET where there was too much policing by (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Redirecting posts (was: Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?)
|
|
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:Gpq6u2.E6o@lugnet.com... (...) I don't think anyone wants to put the burden on you for these types of posts. But I would like to see the climate change here so when people do correct others for (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Redirecting posts (was: Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?)
|
|
Well if you think that support for vigilantes is what we need I shall watch with interest. However, I for one do not feel that the bickering which results is helpful to LUGNET. Do you? "Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Redirecting posts (was: Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?)
|
|
(...) Thanks Dan! I'm sure I speak for a lot of us when I say I want you to have time to code... your rate of feature-add on peeron just whets our appetite. (...) Better than it was before you spoke up but not a certainty. :-) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Redirecting posts (was: Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?)
|
|
(...) I appreciate what Larry is doing, and I do think it's a good thing that community members teach new people where to post. Please, don't place the burden of redirecting all these posts on me, since I will have no time left for other things (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?
|
|
(...) It is pretty gentle and mild as it is. I doubt most people would say "may." ;) Jeff (25 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?
|
|
(...) Use e-mail. A 2nd suggestion: I think it is time you stopped being "LUGNET policeman". Todd has made it clear the Dan is now the "head whacker" around here. Suz has already said she and Todd are stressed right now, why not just leave this well (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?
|
|
(...) The key words are "to this level of detail." When I saw your post, my thoughts ran something like this: "Yeah, Larry is right about this. But, at least it's in buy-sell-trade so Morton isn't too far off. Aw, who cares..." Then I clicked back (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?
|
|
(...) If someone can come up with a gentler and milder way of saying this, please let me know. I'm all ears. But it needed to be said, and that someone bucked against my saying it illustrates quite clearly my point that LUGNET has a serious (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | LUGNET Awards? (was: My top 10)
|
|
Do you have any idea what you've just prompted? Of course this may have already come up a long, long time ago, but I may as well state it, had it not been stated before. What am I talking about? LUGNET Awards... LUGNET has become a big name in Lego, (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:Gpn86A.JAB@lugnet.com... (...) server (...) lately) (...) whack (...) I have definitely noticed all of Dan's hard behind the scenes work on LUGNET (and on LDraw). Hats off to Dan! Its reassuring (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
(...) Not everyone reads the .admin groups. (...) We're going to allow Dan Boger (who has quite a bit of access on the server and who, as some have noticed, has been doing a lot behind the scenes lately) to help out with these sorts of things more (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Charter Links (was Re: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
(...) well, I'm open to suggestions - though I think the message authentication part is more important... especially after the first time you post. These links are more to allow you to look up a charter when you need it, than to force you to read it (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Charter Links (was Re: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
(...) Yep, it's there, and it's good to have a convenient way to get to charters. But I notice that (at least in Pine) the charter links are more than a screenful of text below the front of the message. If all I did was reply with my "x" in the (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
(...) I check in every day, at least twice per day. Even when I had no net access during my recent move, I checked in via public library. Additionally, I receive all admin posts via e-mail which I read continuously as I work at home. I'm not sure (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Pics: 0-6-0 Steam Engine
|
|
(...) XFUT admin.general... (25 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Need to get password emailed
|
|
(...) That was fast....Thanks a lot. Michael (25 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Lego Auctions
|
|
(...) Very cool, thanks! --Bill. (25 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
LUGNET Admin wrote in message ... (...) Unfortunately, we can't tell if you're listening... hmm, maybe a little ear icon could show when the admin is online :-) :-) Seriously, several people have chimed in to this and other threads, with worries (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Lego Auctions
|
|
(...) as promised, it's now in place. When you get the email confirmation, you should get links to all the charters of the groups you're posting to. :) Dan (25 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Need to get password emailed
|
|
(...) sure, done. Dan (25 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Need to get password emailed
|
|
Hi, I don't know who to send email to but I thought this would be an appropriate group. I haven't used my password for quite some time and I have no idea what it is. Could I get my password emailed to me somehow? Thanks, Michael Member #82 (25 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Lego Auctions
|
|
(...) I have allowed myself to be misunderstood/deviated. As I said before, I am not sure anything needs to be done on this issue. If people really want to find a charter for any group I expect they will find it. I am just not aware of a flood of (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Lego Auctions
|
|
I can only fully agree with your posting ... and have a question. (...) <mea culpa> This is exactly what I do. </mea culpa> My newsreader (Outlook Express for Mac) doesn't seem to offer a way to see the group charter. I know this is a weak excuse, (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
(...) I jumped into this from a posting in off-topic.debate, and didn't follow discussion here until then. Given Suzanne's recent posting, we will probably see changes within hours, which is a good thing ... Greetings Horst (25 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
"LUGNET Admin" <suz@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:GpJtCD.A7w@lugnet.com... (...) Well, I don't expect a direct reply to each of my remarks. I do hope that issues will be resolved promptly though. That's the standard that has been set in the (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
(...) I hope you don't assume that Todd (or anyone else) is 'absent' from these forums when he doesn't respond loudly, swiftly and/or directly to each of your remarks. I, for one, have been here every day - listening to your comments. (...) Then it (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
(...) Dunno. I hope so. I was encouraged by his postings. I'm very very glad to see him saying things even when they're things I may not agree with (the LD thing) (...) Yes, I think so. People should start posting very VERY gentle reminders (with a (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
(...) I'd be happy with .announce.moc. As you say, you get the choice with the view plain - us technic-heads have already had to get used to this with bionicle 8?/ and it's OK once you get used to it. Just means you've gotta individually check all (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GpIu2r.4zr@lugnet.com... (...) MOCs. (...) laws (...) The MOC posts in .announce continue despite Todd's word on it. Will Todd take futher action to enforce what he said? Is it (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
(...) Yep, this was suggested elsewhere in the thread and it has a lot of merit. My preference would be for build.announce as that keeps the announce tree low traffic. (yes, you could view .announce without subgroups but then you miss (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
