Subject:
|
Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 6 Jan 2002 23:22:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
372 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Horst Lehner writes:
> > Hello Larry, hello everybody,
> >
> > I would suggest to create a new group lugnet.announce.moc. Most of the
> > postings some people find unappropriate for any of the other
> > lugnet.announce.* groups could probably fit there ...
>
> Yep, this was suggested elsewhere in the thread and it has a lot of merit.
> My preference would be for build.announce as that keeps the announce tree
> low traffic. (yes, you could view .announce without subgroups but then you
> miss announce.brickshelf, for instance, which by rights ought to be low
> traffic and full of only highly important things)
I'd be happy with .announce.moc. As you say, you get the choice with the
view plain - us technic-heads have already had to get used to this with
bionicle 8?/ and it's OK once you get used to it. Just means you've gotta
individually check all the sub-groups you're interested in 8?( But nntp &
smtp subscribers have to do this already.
> Another alternative would be to change the .announce charter to allow MOCs.
> The current situation is no good as it (like artificially low speeding laws
> in other contexts) tends to foster disrespect for order. Flouted charters
> dilute the very CONCEPT of a charter.
Agreed.
ROSCO (Who's flouted charters in the past, and probably will in the future,
until someone points it out...)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
17 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
