Subject:
|
Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:14:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
511 times
|
| |
| |
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
news:GpIu2r.4zr@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.admin.general, Horst Lehner writes:
> > Hello Larry, hello everybody,
> >
> > I would suggest to create a new group lugnet.announce.moc. Most of the
> > postings some people find unappropriate for any of the other
> > lugnet.announce.* groups could probably fit there ...
>
> Yep, this was suggested elsewhere in the thread and it has a lot of merit.
> My preference would be for build.announce as that keeps the announce tree
> low traffic. (yes, you could view .announce without subgroups but then you
> miss announce.brickshelf, for instance, which by rights ought to be low
> traffic and full of only highly important things)
>
> Another alternative would be to change the .announce charter to allow MOCs.
> The current situation is no good as it (like artificially low speeding laws
> in other contexts) tends to foster disrespect for order. Flouted charters
> dilute the very CONCEPT of a charter.
The MOC posts in .announce continue despite Todd's word on it. Will Todd
take futher action to enforce what he said? Is it something we should make
socially unacceptable here? As long as Todd is absentee from LUGNET I would
imagine we won't be getting a new newsgroup.
-Tim
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
17 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|