To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 10000
9999  |  10001
Subject: 
Re: Redirecting posts (was: Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Sat, 12 Jan 2002 18:34:21 GMT
Viewed: 
852 times
  
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Scott A wrote:

In lugnet.admin.general, Thomas Garrison writes:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Scott A wrote:

In lugnet.admin.general, Tim Courtney writes:

There are definite advantages to posting and definite advantages to private
email.  But I think redirecting is something that's better to post publicly
so others can learn too - not just newbies but everyone.

1. Poster places message in wrong group.
2. User e-mails poster
3. If it is bad enough, poster posts an apology.
4. Ends with no fuss.

Or
2b. Poster receives 10--20 e-mail messages telling him that he's wrong
(many probably more caustic than would have been posted in public) because
no one is sure that someone has corrected him.
3b. Poster feels harassed.

I agree you have a point. But do you think the current system leaves users
feeling any less harassed?

Being corrected in a public forum is somewhat disturbing to most people.
On the other hand, getting one correction message is (I would think) less
disturbing than getting many.  The latter inadvertantly communicates a
sense of the "in-group" (Lugnetters) "ganging up" on the newcomer and
making him feel unwelcome, while the former is a one-on-one interaction.
I also suspect that the tone of a public message is, in general, more
likely to be positive than a private message ("I think you misread the
charter" vs. "you jerk, where do you get off posting here without reading
the charter?").

Also, responding publicly with follow-ups appropriately set *hopefully*
gives others a clue about in which group to respond, so the process
needn't be repeated with the next person who responds to the original
message. . .

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
TWS Garrison
tgarriso@math.purdue.edu
   http://www.math.purdue.edu/~tgarriso/



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Redirecting posts (was: Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?)
 
(...) I agree you have a point. But do you think the current system leaves users feeling any less harassed? Scott A (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)

11 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR