Geeking : 970


Off-Topic / Geek / 970	969 \| 971

Subject:	Re: KDE/new Redhat install (was Re: Has anyone ever been)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date:	Thu, 30 Dec 1999 11:26:02 GMT
Viewed:	2309 times

On Wed, 29 Dec 1999 08:13:42 GMT, cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley) wrote: > Would surprise me. Samba blows. Sorry, but it does. Touching it > with 95/98, which, unfortunately, is what a ton of places use, is a > slow painful joke. Touching it with NT is slightly better, but > still slow and painful. The question is, how does it's blowiness relate to the negative-mass white hole that is NT SMB serving? Jasper

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: KDE/new Redhat install (was Re: Has anyone ever been)
(...) Well, not sure. But in my admittedly limited Linux/Samba experience trying to introduce Samba as an alternative to NT for file serving is a joke. File copies went from seconds to minutes on 95/98, and at increased dramatically even when (...) (25 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: KDE/new Redhat install (was Re: Has anyone ever been)
(...) Wouldn't surprise me. (...) Would surprise me. Samba blows. Sorry, but it does. Touching it with 95/98, which, unfortunately, is what a ton of places use, is a slow painful joke. Touching it with NT is slightly better, but still slow and (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

92 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search