Subject:
|
Re: KDE/new Redhat install (was Re: Has anyone ever been)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Tue, 28 Dec 1999 23:23:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1994 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Dec 1999 22:41:59 GMT, Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net>
wrote:
> Let's be sure we're on the same page. If you're saying groupware itself
> is not a good thing, vehemently disagree. I'll be happy to briefly
> explain how indispensable it is if that is what you were saying.
Groupware is a nice idea.
>
> However, if you're saying that Exchange and Notes are implementations
> that, shall we say, could have been just a wee bit better (putting it
> mildly), strongly agree.
It's just that I've never seen or heard of any implementation yet
which, _especially_ in the area of email delivery (which is
ridiuclously high-volume compared to almost all other groupware
traffic), doesn't suck petrified Utah-raptors through McDonalds
straws.
If you have to have groupware, have a dedicated server range with quad
Xeons for Notes/Exchange, and run the email through a Sun box. Or even
a single=pentium-non-MMX linux/sendmail box.
Seriously. I've heard of one admin who was running Bloats on a Quad
Xeon P-II-550 with the works, who secretly rerouted email traffic
through a spare P-166 box running linux, and only got complaints when
people noticed a few months later that the server never crashed
anymore.
I know of similar examples involving NT Server 4 fileserving and
linux/samba.
Jasper
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
92 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
