Subject:
|
Re: KDE/new Redhat install (was Re: Has anyone ever been)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Dec 1999 23:53:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1639 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 01:33:01 GMT, cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley)
wrote:
> Jasper Janssen <jasper@janssen.dynip.com> wrote:
> Me either. My two co-admins and I just sat there and barely
> contained our urge to vomit while we went through the installer. If
> I hadn't feared the 40 gig drive would give <6.1 fits I would have
> scrounged around for my 5.2 or 6.0 cds...
6.0 is 2.2.7 or something, isn't it? Shouldn't that deal with 40G?
> Yeah. If I had more money to blow (I don't - especially after
> buying my new TV and still needing a new DD/DTS receiver/speaker
> package) I'd have SCSI in that box, but it's purely personal and
> non-production, so I don't mind.
Light load helps a lot. Though if you were planning on running a full
feed for yourself, light load isn't exactly the word...
> Heh, took me long enough. And the crappy thing is, I will need to
> recertify in the Win2k track by the end of 2001. Best thing,
Not like win2k should be more difficult than NT. I think with a book,
some practice, and just the $100 test you can probably pass it easily.
> though, is my employer is paying and has paid for 100% of the
> training and tests. 'Course, the curriculum I'm developing and the
> classes I will soon start teaching will save them close to $200k per
> year, assuming they're wise enough to give me a raise, so they're
> getting their money's worth.
And if they don't give you a raise, you walk? Won't you have to pay
them the training costs back then?
Jasper
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
92 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
