To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 419
418  |  420
Subject: 
Re: CFD: e-bay (aka ranting and raving)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 10 Feb 1999 00:41:18 GMT
Viewed: 
434 times
  
James Brown wrote:
On about 2/3 of the auctions I've participated in, or followed, there has been
a similar flow to the bids.  Several people bid on it in the first day or so
(sometimes more, sometimes less, depending on how popular it is), it reaches a
fairly reasonable price, and sits there, uncontested, until 4-6 hours before
the auction ends.  Several people bid on it in the last few hours, and in some
cases, the last few minutes.  This sometimes pushes the price beyond
reasonable(2), but more often, the 'high bidder' is over-turned on his high bid
by the absolute minimum necessary, before they have a chance to react.  One
(probably extreme) case saw an item jump from 4 bids to 11 bids in the last
hour, all from only 1 bidder.

Well...to be fair, eBay /does/ have that 'bidding gnome' thing.  The idea is
that
you tell it the maximum you want to pay for the set, and it does the bidding
for
you so you don't have to watch it.  This is why the final bid is usually only
the
minimum raise above the previous bid.

Trouble is, people get 'bidding fever' - they see that someone has beat their
last
bid by 'only a quarter' or some such, so they bid again...and again...and they wind
up bidding a lot more than they originally had as their max.

In short, eBay would work fine, if it weren't for human nature.  ;)

Personally, I have both gotten some good deals on eBay [1] and succumbed to
'bidder's
fever' once or twice.  (Fortunately, I was always outbid in the latter case
and was
able to come to my senses...)

J

[1] - I honestly didn't think one was a /great/ deal at the time, just a good
one, but
I have since seen the set auctioned on RTL with a minimum bid of half again
what I
paid...too much to my mind, but hey, if you want something you want it I guess...



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: CFD: e-bay (aka ranting and raving)
 
Jeff Johnston wrote in message <36C0D5AC.3D7D0B2@me...ne.net>... (...) I think one of the key reasons they use that system is human nature. In other words, it is working fine--even better than fine, perhaps. Jesse ___...___ Jesse The Jolly Jingoist (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: CFD: e-bay (aka ranting and raving)
 
(...) I guess there's no reason why you couldn't do that in lugnet auctions, if you tell the seller how much you'll go up to, and the seller is willing to do the auction that way. Simon (URL) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: CFD: e-bay (aka ranting and raving)
 
(...) The other trouble is, if I'm bidding in multiple auctions, my maximum bid in one auction depends on what I end up spending in other auctions. So I can't (always) put an absolute maximum bid on a lot, and then just wait to see how it turns out. (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  CFD: e-bay (aka ranting and raving)
 
Ok, is it just me, or does the e-bay style of auction actually encourage "unfair"(1) bidding practises? On about 2/3 of the auctions I've participated in, or followed, there has been a similar flow to the bids. Several people bid on it in the first (...) (26 years ago, 9-Feb-99, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

89 Messages in This Thread:
































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR