To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 16189
16188  |  16190
Subject: 
Re: Conflict in the Middle East
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 19 Apr 2002 13:53:59 GMT
Viewed: 
1024 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
<snip>
As did the British Empire and the United States.  Why?  There was no 'clear
victory' of either side in that war ('cause like, Canada's still here :) )
but, bottom line, imho,-- education.  First it was war.  Then realizing that
neither party was getting anywhere with it, they grew up, sucked it up, put
aside their differences (sure it took decades),  got to a point where they
could say 'we agree to disagree'.  Look at the countries now.

Huh? I'm pretty sure that there was a clear victor in the American
Revolution, otherwise our money would still have a picture of the Queen on
it. (no real comment on why Canada is here :))

Education is good, I also think that having a common goal or enemy can bring
countries together. Kind of like how it works in a family sometimes. I can
pick on my brother all I want, but if someone outside of my family tries to
mess with him, they have to mess with me also.

Now if the world was to be attacked by aliens the I think as a world we
could put aside our differences in order to combat the common enemy, the
aliens. Well maybe, there would probably be some country that would try to
suck up to the attacking aliens and become allies with them, and the French
would just surrender....ok ok, just kidding.

jt



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Conflict in the Middle East
 
(...) like Independance Day--I really liked the Presidents speech - the world united with one voice--'we shall not go quietly into the night...' etc. Sometimes I wish there was an external threat to humanity, cause that would put all these petty (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Conflict in the Middle East
 
(...) Um, arguably if you were to place the AR in the context of the overall NA colonial struggle, as just one part of the entire multiparty "war" (other parts included the French and Indian war, and the War of 1812, as well as undeclared naval wars (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Conflict in the Middle East
 
(...) As did the British Empire and the United States. Why? There was no 'clear victory' of either side in that war ('cause like, Canada's still here :) ) but, bottom line, imho,-- education. First it was war. Then realizing that neither party was (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

93 Messages in This Thread:





































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR