Subject:
|
Re: Conflict in the Middle East
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 Apr 2002 08:10:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1034 times
|
| |
|
|
> The city of Jerusalem should probably fall into the administrative hands of
> an international non-profit consortium or something like that, in the same
> manner that we incorporate cities in the U.S. (not that I like it, but
> Jerusalem is kind of a special case situation). This might be one of the
> few legitimate uses of the power of the U.N. if it isn't considered too
> politically hot to handle the job.
In '49 the UN passed a resolution to put Jerusalem under its control. Four
days later Israel moved the Knesset there.
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Conflict in the Middle East
|
| Just some super-quick thoughts on this ongoing problem... (...) How can the U.S. send crystal clear messages about aggression when our hands are dirty in Afghanistan? (...) Short-term solutions will not work in this conflict, not that I disagree (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
93 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
