To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brandsOpen lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Clone Brands / 1901
1900  |  1902
Subject: 
Re: A serious clone question
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands
Date: 
Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:59:05 GMT
Viewed: 
1930 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, Dave Schuler wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, Mike Kollross wrote:

I buy Lego because it is a quality product that will last for decades.  I
have Lego that is 30 years old and is great shape.  I challenge you to show
me MB's half that old that have stood the test of time.

  I've only been buying MegaBloks since 1993, but most of them are holding up
quite nicely, thanks.  Admittedly, the translucent elements from that period are
not too great and are subject to loss of clutch, but I have thousands of green
or brown 1x2, 2x2, and 2x4 bricks that work every bit as well as when I bought
them (which is to say, very nearly as well as LEGO).  I'll let you know how
they're doing in five years, if you'd like!  8^)

     Dave!

I'll be looking for your post in 2008.  Play well!

Mike



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: A serious clone question
 
(...) I've only been buying MegaBloks since 1993, but most of them are holding up quite nicely, thanks. Admittedly, the translucent elements from that period are not too great and are subject to loss of clutch, but I have thousands of green or brown (...) (21 years ago, 19-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)

66 Messages in This Thread:























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR