| |
In lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
| |
I’m saying does a side need to be taken? I haven’t really seen it as an
issue (beyond this thread).
|
No, of course you don’t need to take sides.
To me, there are 2 separate issues here:
1-Was my answer to the theorical question from David stated in an offensive way
towards anyone? 2-Was Hop-Frog’s comments abusive?
This IS a storm in a glass of water, I’ll agree to that. If Richard Marchetti
has something against my opinion, then he should have said so politely.
Instead, he insulted a whole part of this community.
As for the original question, I thought it was fairly answered by myself that it
wouldn’t be a big deal for me. I mean, people do it on occasion, I’ve never
complained about clone parts before. I was merely saying was many think: Lugnet
is about LEGO more than clones, although I’ll admit that many people can think
of “LEGO” as the parts rather the Company.
Terry
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A serious clone question
|
| (...) "Yes" to what question? In that despite whatever Terry may have said, almost no one makes a fuss about non-lego bricks? I understand the sequence of the fuss, which honestly, is neither here nor there to me. (...) I'm saying does a side need (...) (21 years ago, 18-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
66 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
