| |
In lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
It rather is with the rabble rouser who latches onto a (small, if even a
controversy at all) controversy to try to make it into a larger one by
repeatedly making inflammatory statements. And we all know who that rabble
rouser is, as he’s done it before here and elsewhere, and it’s not you, Dave!
|
I like how you minimize the problems of others. And perhaps I am exaggerating
these problems -- but let’s not pretend there isn’t a problem at all. There
really is a problem here and if there wasn’t people wouldn’t be so defensive
about it.
If you have anything intelligent to say, Larry -- besides taking shots at my
supposed rabble-rousing -- why don’t you take that huge intellect of yours and
address this post: http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/clone-brands/?n=1890
It’s put up, or shut up, Baby!
It’s rather funny that you chose a classist loaded phrase like “rabble-rouser,”
maybe perceived classism has EVERYTHING to do with the problem? I kind of
miss the days of our private correspondences -- would you be so kind as to
remind me of just how wealthy you are Larry? I guess what I really miss is
thinking about all your money...
-- Hop-Frog
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A serious clone question
|
| (...) I haven't previously commented on the original question you raised, Dave! But since you (indirectly) asked, I have no issue with the form of your original question, did not think it was quibbling, and think the answer that you and others (...) (21 years ago, 19-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
66 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
