| |
In lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, Mike Kollross wrote:
> I buy Lego because it is a quality product that will last for decades. I
> have Lego that is 30 years old and is great shape. I challenge you to show
> me MB's half that old that have stood the test of time.
I've only been buying MegaBloks since 1993, but most of them are holding up
quite nicely, thanks. Admittedly, the translucent elements from that period are
not too great and are subject to loss of clutch, but I have thousands of green
or brown 1x2, 2x2, and 2x4 bricks that work every bit as well as when I bought
them (which is to say, very nearly as well as LEGO). I'll let you know how
they're doing in five years, if you'd like! 8^)
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A serious clone question
|
| (...) Good to see you keep an open mind:0) I can tell the difference between Lego and Clones -any clone- simply from the sound. They sound cheap and they are cheap. In respone to your paint analogy- An artist uses quality products not cheap knock (...) (21 years ago, 19-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
66 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
