| |
I'd say no.
This is a site dedicated to LEGO products (IMO), so the promotion of MOC done
with clones wouldn't respect that fact.
Also, and maybe more importantly, I, like many others, have no interest
whatsoever in MOC made with clone parts. A message announcing them would just
waste my time. I don't mean to say that this is of any importance to you, but
if most f the people here are like me regarding that, then it would be a waste
of most people's time, so I think it would also be a lack of respect towards
this community.
I am only saying my point of view here. It may or may not represent the
opinions of other members.
As for me, I'm disappointed everytime i see a clone part on a MOC in BrichShelf.
I always feel cheated and I immediately exit from that folder. There should
always be a huge warning in big fat red letters saying : "BEWARE : CLONE CRAP
HERE!!!" :-)
Terry
PS: especially if it's MegaBlocks !!!
|
|
Message has 4 Replies:
 | | Re: A serious clone question
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, Terry Prosper wrote: **snip of my clones-ok-in-the-MOC-group question*** (...) Makes sense. That's why I thought a feeler question was a better way to start than with a dozen "Hey Look At My Clones" postings. (...) (...) (21 years ago, 15-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
| | | Re: A serious clone question
|
| (...) Well, I'd have to disagree and say "probably". My main focus is technic, and several great MOCs have been announced and discussed in the technic group which use modified LEGO, or totally user-created parts (the obvious example is John Barnes' (...) (21 years ago, 16-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
| | | Re: A serious clone question
|
| (...) I'd agree with Terry. <<snip the personal brick xenophobia>> It IS a Lego resource, and the opportunity for us to leverage some of the impressive community systems here into our extended appreciation of the power of the brick is a discretion (...) (21 years ago, 17-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
| | | Re: A serious clone question
|
| (...) Interesting. I think Mega Bloks is directly responsible for saving The Lego Company. If not for Mega Bloks successfully taking a portion of the market share and forcing TLC to reevaluate its direction of straight down the toilet a few years (...) (21 years ago, 17-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | A serious clone question
|
| Hi All: Is it appropriate to share clone-brand creations here, or at least to announce them, if follow-ups are directed to OT.Clones? I checked the charter for MOC group, and there's no specific prohibition against clone-based or clone-inclusive (...) (21 years ago, 14-Aug-03, to lugnet.announce.moc)
|
66 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
