|
I think its very easy for those of you insisting on brand exclusionary
practices to see yourselves as inoffensive, but youre not.
The very act of telling someone like Dave! to stay in his little corner of
lugnet and not come out or be seen by others is wildly offensive -- far more
offensive than the word idiots said a thousand different ways to thousands of
different people.
How could you fail to see this simple fact?
Strangely, I was just noticing the clickits forum had been added to lugnet, a
less builder friendly product is probably rarely seen around these parts -- but
hey, its official lego excrement, so that makes it okay! I get to Mark P.s
site/review where he proudly proclaims This aint no MegaBlocks site! (see:
http://www.landofbricks.com/home.html) Whats the difference who makes this
silly product when it barely qualifies as brick compatible? I am not
denigrating the product per se, I am critiquing its open acceptance as a
canonical TLC product (which is de facto) when its utility seems very much in
question. By contrast, products of far greater utility and compatibility go by
many of you unnoticed because they are not made by TLC.
To me this site is largely about MOCs and building, and that only very
peripherally has anything to do with brand loyalty. Maybe I failed to understand
the purpose of this site -- is it just one long advert for TLC products? I
mean, I understand that many of us favor TLC bricks -- but is the emphasis
here on TLC or bricks?
But yeah, its me -- Im the one with the problem. Not you guys with your nose
in the air...
-- Hop-Frog
|
|
Message has 3 Replies: | | Re: A serious clone question
|
| (...) I'm only saying that this site is called LEGO-USER GROUP network. Not Bricks user group network. Dave can go post his LEGO MOC like anyother in the announce.MOC forums, but this site is dedicated to LEGO, not clones. And it's not as if I was (...) (21 years ago, 18-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
| | | Re: A serious clone question
|
| (...) Private Propery, dude. You can not like how it's run, and you can complain all you like, but if you don't like it, leave it. (...) You'd be wrong. from (URL) : I think anything about other non-LEGO® systems would really need a hierarchy name (...) (21 years ago, 18-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
| | | Re: A serious clone question
|
| (...) He's not being told to stay in his little corner of LUGNET. Everyone here is free to post just about wherever they want, as long as it doesn't violate any charter guidelines. He is being told that clone MOCs probably aren't acceptable outside (...) (21 years ago, 19-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A serious clone question
|
| (...) You are my hero, Hop-Frog, uniter of the Lugnet community by insulting most of us. As for me, I was only saying I'd rather not see clone elements, but hey, it was YOU who started insulting other people, so I guess it makes you the (...) (21 years ago, 18-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
66 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|