| |
In lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, James Brown wrote:
<snip>
> But that's all getting pretty far outside LUGNET's sphere of focus. I'd
> like to encourage talk of imitation brands or other construction toys about
> as much as I'd like to encourage flaming debates over politics and religion.
> Don't get me wrong -- I think all of that is great stuff; this just isn't
> the place to nurture it.
Haha! Great sense of humor dude :-) I really like your style :-D
<snip>
> Now admittedly that can of worms is about 4-5 years old now, and may want
> re-opening, I don't know. But blasting at Terry for saying "that's not what
> this site is about" isn't going to get you anywhere, because, well, [he's
> right]. If you want to complain, go complain to the management who set it >up
Thanks James. I'm waaaaaay too lazy to make these research by myself ;-)
It's nice to see some people like James are more concerned with the facts than
the flaming of people. He did it in all respect of Hop-Frog, so great job !
Terry
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A serious clone question
|
| (...) Private Propery, dude. You can not like how it's run, and you can complain all you like, but if you don't like it, leave it. (...) You'd be wrong. from (URL) : I think anything about other non-LEGO® systems would really need a hierarchy name (...) (21 years ago, 18-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
66 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
