Subject:
|
Re: ldglite (ldlite for OpenGL and Linux) new stuff
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 Jan 2000 21:51:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1356 times
|
| |
|
|
libtool eh? What the heck is that? I seem to have it in /usr/local/bin
but "man libtool" turns up nothing. I guess I'll have to read the man pages
on gcc and ld to find out more about the shared libs vs static linking
switches. Oh well, I was gonna have to do that someday anyways. It's just
not the most fun part of this whole project.
I have to admit, I'm pretty psyched about the 3360 byte executable size you
attained, even if it doesn't work...
Don
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: ldglite (ldlite for OpenGL and Linux) new stuff
|
| (...) Actually I'm not quite as impressed as I was a few minutes ago. I checked the size of the executable in the zip file and it's only 81064 bytes. The bloat we saw was the debugging symbols. You can remove them with this. strip ldglite I now (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: ldglite (ldlite for OpenGL and Linux) new stuff
|
| (...) Weird. It was looking for the object libraries at runtime, yet the filesize was wicked huge. (I wonder what's up with that? It should only be a few Kb in size.) Now I just linked it a different way -- closer to what the Mesa demos do -- and it (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
70 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
