LEGO Direct : 4328


LEGO Company / LEGO Direct / 4328

You get to choose! —

Jake McKee

Working for LEGO Direct is always fun, but every once in a while a project comes along that just makes me giddy when I get to come here and announce it. Today, such an announcement is made. We would like to invite you all to choose our next LEGO (...) (22 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.lego.announce) !!

Re: You get to choose! —Pedro Silva

(...) Yepee! (...) I'd put a buck if I could... helàs, I can only vote once. Off to vote now, 6390 come to daddy! Pedro (very, very happy - thank you LEGO!!!!) (22 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Matthew Gerber

(...) guess on which will win? 8?) Matt (22 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Kevin Loch

(...) M'Kay, It was time for a poll change anyway :) (URL) updated) KL (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Rob Drechsel

(...) Kevin, is there any way to make sure that people don't vote for a set more than once? I wouldn't want to see somebody rigging the polls. :o) Rob robo2705@hotmail.com (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Kevin Loch

(...) While there are some controls to reduce the chances and effect of ballot stuffing, there is no sure way to prevent it (without requiring a login like LEGO does on their poll). KL (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Tim Courtney

(...) I have one word, 'space.' And for you non-spaceheads, remember, that set comes with black shutters. Jake...you da man!! -Tim (22 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Kyle Keppler

This is for the spacies who seldom stray from thier humber section of Lugnet... SPACE. (Read on...) (...) Word there Timmah. --Kyle (URL) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.space, lugnet.build)

Re: You get to choose! —Coby Bassett

(...) Yes, I agree with your disappointment. My vote goes to the big, yellow castle. Still waiting for Space... (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.space, lugnet.build)

Re: You get to choose! —Chris Giddens

(...) space. I votes for Blacktron! Chris <>< (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Matt Hein

(...) Alright! Let's see some space! (or on the contrary, something cool at that:) I'm just hoping the next Legend will diversify the Legend's series. Then Lego Direst's product line will be a *bit* more stellar. Just my two brickz... <<_Matt (...) (22 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —John Rudy

(...) Jake, all I can say is, Wow! Why do you torture me so? As a fan of Town, I lean towards <Set:6390> But, as a lover of "my Era" of classic sets, I look towards <Set:6285> Grrr, Decisions Decisions! :) Also, one quick question. If LEGO can (...) (22 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Benjamin Medinets

(...) I too voted for 6390 for the simple fact that it was going for in excess of $100 on E-bay, and it would be sold for around $60. "...it would include new ”rails” for the crane to slide sideways in, new road plates with a broader road and fewer (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Don Heyse

The voting page mentions some changes required for the yellow castle, but I didn't see anything about the little red windows. Could this set possibly come with the real 1x1x1 windows? I need to know before I register to vote. :) Don (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Adrian Drake

(...) Cool. At Brickfest last year, I practically begged Brad Justus to re-release the Battrax as the next Legends set. It certainly is nice to know he listened. Excellent! *crosses fingers* Adrian -- www.brickfrenzy.com (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Josh Baakko

Are you able to vote again!? My internet is not working properly & it stoped loading the pages halfway though:-( Not the server won't let me try again:-( Josh (who is going to change his ISP after dealing with 2 months of CRAP (excuse my language), (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Thomas Garrison

(...) today?" not have as an option "To vote"? Although there was an "Other" option. . . Note: all those cookies recipio.com wants to set aren't needed to vote. Voting would be a more pleasant experiece if recipio.com didn't try. Obligatory effusive (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Matthew Gerber

(...) person...why are we allowed to vote twice a day? Maybe this would have worked best as a straight poll, with IPs logged? Matt (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Shaun Sullivan

I had to vote for the Barracuda :P All of the other sets can be built, or very nearly so, from easily accessible pieces. The Barracuda, however ... those pieces are a treasure! -s (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Wayne McCaul

Me too. Pirates were a theme that ran during my dark age; I'm seriously bummed that I missed them. No really, I'm crying right now... I'd love to see a nice big BROWN hull make it's way into my collection. Groove On. -Evil Wayne ___...___ (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Jason Krish

(...) Hello all...8^) My two bricks on the potential re-releases: 375 Yellow Castle Now here is a Legend choice. I can remember seeing it in the catalogs way back when and wishing I had it. Plus seeing the castle ideas in the old 6000 idea book and (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Jeffrey M. Szklennik

(...) MAIN STREET MAIN STREET MAIN STREET Pleeeeeease!!!...!!! Please! Please! i voted but i was SO excited--this is my all time favorite set jeff (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Tom Reed

(...) Wow! I think it's great for Lego to give us such a great selection to choose from. While I'm leaning towards the 6285 or the yellow castle, I am wondering about the comment on the new tree for set 6390. Will this be a NEW tree (unlike any (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Frank Filz

(...) Definitely exists (I have two 664 TV Camera sets bought for the black hat). There is at least one other stiffy set with a black cowboy hat (372 Texas Rangers, which also has red ones). I agree about the question on the tree on 6390, WHY??? (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Mike Petrucelli

Waa Hoo! Those are all great sets that I would like to get. Of course being a space fan my vote had to go to the best space theme ever, Blacktron. I would be almost as happy with a Falcon Fortress though just for the grey pieces. -Mike Petrucelli (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Robert Miles

(...) WELCOME BACK, BLACK SEAS BARRACUDA! Ok, it's a premature statement, but of the 5 listed, it is by far, the greatest of the 5! Be sure to vote and bring one of the 5 back (hint: vote for the BSB! LOL)! -EmeraldOak (Robert) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Aaron West

(...) Well folk, just returned from voting (how could I resist!) and those are some "interesting" choices. Let me post here what my impressions as a 25+ year Fan-O-LEGO and an owner of what my wife calls,"too much LEGO": 1. Yellow Castle (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Bryan Wong

(...) Yeah I pretty much voted the same way you voted, Aaron, as I feel the same way about the sets in question. I'm crazy about castle too, so I'd get multiple copies of 6074 for the grey bricks, walls, and corners. And those minifigs! I only have (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Jonathan Mizner

(...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Thomas Stangl

Thanks, but it didn't work. In Communicator 4.79, it loaded a blank page when I tried to go to the voting area. (GO button for the surveys area). I loaded it in IE5.5SP2, and it loaded blank too, so I hit Reload. After that, if I clicked the GO (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! (first none-"Wow"-answer) —Reinhard "Ben" Beneke

(...) Hi Jake and people at lego.direct, I am not glad about the idea of the legends at all (in the way they are done so far). I gave my opinions in lugnnet.trains when the Metroliner 10001 has been released (That is in fact the only train set I (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Desiring Machine (was Re: You get to choose!) —Richard Marchetti

(...) Spoken like a collector without regard for what others may or may not have in their collections. I see this as a kind of greed on your part, pure and simple. Others, who for reasons of youth or having made different spending choices in the (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: Desiring Machine (was Re: You get to choose!) —Jeromy Irvine

(...) I have to jump in and add my agreement to this post. Speaking as someone who did not have the opportunity to get the Battrax when I was younger, I am thrilled to have another chance at getting it now that I have the purchasing power to do so. (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: Desiring Machine (was Re: You get to choose!) —Daniel Crichton

"J. Irvine" <irvinej@accuvera.com> wrote in message news:GuGM3J.6po@lugnet.com... (...) who (...) purchasing (...) close (...) I agree here with this - when I was younger I had a couple of small Classic Space sets but they disappeared a long time (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: Desiring Machine (was Re: You get to choose!) —Matt Hein

(...) I tried to not to be too much of a "me too" person around Lugnet, but I thought I would have to throw in my agrument here too. On Beneke's opinion. When I was younger, I never had a chance to get my hands on a Battrax, Yellow Castle or even a (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: Desiring Machine (was Re: You get to choose!) —John Henry Kruer

(...) Amen! I have to agree. And I, for one, have grown up with UFO, town JR, and Insectoids, and believe me, I ain't happy with it! :-) Lego Legends are supposed to be that: legends. I think that if you don't count a set as a legend just because (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: Desiring Machine (was Re: You get to choose!) —Matt Hein

(...) Yeah. I was stuck with excuses for space for quite a while until Star Wars hit the market. (and I joined Lugnet) (...) Yeah. For months I wanted a Guarded Inn before it became a legend, and there was *no way* I would blow one hundred dollars (...) (22 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: Desiring Machine (was Re: You get to choose!) —Reinhard "Ben" Beneke

(...) Just turn the medal and I tell you: it is greed that makes people wanting to have these legends... (Stupid argument of mine? Agree - but is yours the better one?) (...) I do not own one that deserves the name 375. So your argument is (...) (22 years ago, 15-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: Desiring Machine (was Re: You get to choose!) —Richard Marchetti

(...) Well, perhaps -- there is certainly desire for certain elements. I think we would all be served better by more selection in the accessory packs, but if the only way to get some things are going to be the Legend and Classics lines, then so be (...) (22 years ago, 15-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Greed? —Richard Noeckel

(...) Greed? GREED?? G R E E D?!?!?! Whoa… maybe you look @ the hobby in a different manner that I. But ‘Greed’ isn’t a term I'd apply to my ‘yearning’ for a 375. ~Perhaps your word usage is flawed? I don’t see anything gluttonous, or insatiable (...) (22 years ago, 16-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)

Re: Greed? —Matt Hein

(...) Nah, I could easily see myself buying one for the sheer desire to actually get my hands on something so phenominal I never had a chance to acquire. I think desire is a better word. (...) I've never seen anyone who hordes yelloe castle parts, (...) (22 years ago, 16-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Re: Greed? —Larry Pieniazek

(...) Yes, perhaps it is. Ben is E2L(1), please keep that in mind, and sometimes that causes misunderstanding. Reading over your words and his, I don't find that much disagreement, believe it or not. (I'm in the camp that's glad any time Lego, in (...) (22 years ago, 16-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Re: Greed? —Richard Noeckel

(...) Thanks for elaborating on that! I too knew that English was his 2nd Language and therefore I endeavored to point out that the discrepancy may exist in translation. (...) I tried too… I hope I didn’t come across as impolite. I like Ben and (...) (22 years ago, 16-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)

Re: Greed? —Larry Pieniazek

(...) and thanks for that. Sorry if I used your post as a periodic reminder to folks that not everyone is E1L and to keep it in mind.... (...) Roger that! Got any marshmallows for the campfire? (...) :-) (22 years ago, 16-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)

Re: Greed? —William R. Ward

(...) My guess is that LD was waiting to see how well the first one did before committing to doing any more. I'm sure there is a large lead-time for new sets like this, and since it was kept secret until its release, we have no way of knowing how (...) (22 years ago, 17-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)

Re: Greed? —Reinhard "Ben" Beneke

(...) Sorry Richard, English is not my mother tongue. So why did I use the word greed here? As a matter of fact I have not used that word since ever - I had to look into my dictionary to cheack the meaning of "greed". I only have used this word, (...) (22 years ago, 16-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Re: Greed? —Richard Marchetti

(...) Actually, Ben, I think you mean me -- I used the word first. There are two Richards underfoot at this point -- the best way to tell the difference between us is that the other Richard is younger and better looking than I am. =oP -- Hop-Frog (22 years ago, 16-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Re: Greed? —Reinhard "Ben" Beneke

(...) Thanks for jumping in, HopFrog. And sorry to Richard Noeckel. My fault - I mixed up the two names.... Kind Regards, Ben (22 years ago, 16-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

WhAt EvEr! —Richard Noeckel

(...) Man, do I ever feel despondent… I've been here for over 2 years and I'm still second-string to the ‘other’ Richard… (no matter how much he likes me) ;) ~After all, we’ve got two totally different signatures: Mr. Marchetti has the clever, (...) (22 years ago, 17-Apr-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Re: WhAt EvEr! —Lindsay Frederick Braun

(...) You've been here for two years already? Good Lord am I old. (...) That may be why you're second-fiddle. Too many people keep trying to pronounce that...thing. (...) Durst is supposedly musical, and Wilt is worth ten thousand.... (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.people)

. —Richard Noeckel

(...) Your English usage is still quite excellent nevertheless! :) (...) Different individual. (But that’s already been clarified.) Usually when I make a point I endeavor to debate the issues and not the character of the individual. (...) I do (...) (22 years ago, 17-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Legends: good or bad? —Chris Maddison

XPFUT .general <snipped it all> First off, this is XPFUT'd to .general because I'd like to spark an intelligent conversation about the Legends line. I don't want this to turn into some kind of argument or debate. Ben, I can understand your point as (...) (22 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)

Re: You get to choose! (first none-"Wow"-answer) —Tim Strutt

(...) I don't agree at all. Most of us would rather buy a rereleased legend (if it was the theme they liked) than any of the sets available on the shelves right now. The legends available are 10 times better than most of the sets that are now on the (...) (22 years ago, 15-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! (first none-"Wow"-answer) —Lou Zucaro

Yes, I would agree...the legends and re-issues are all super. They are the ONLY new sets (other than a few Star Wars and Harry Potter sets) that I have purchased since '97. LEGO, are you listening? Like many others, I have spent thousands of $$ in (...) (22 years ago, 15-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: Packaging Style (was:You get to choose!) —Jason Spears

In lugnet.lego.direct, Lou Zucaro writes: <snip> (...) Actually I like it. Now if someone has returned the set after opening it, or worse yet, opened and plundered it at the store, there is no question about it. Also those heavy duty cardboard boxes (...) (22 years ago, 16-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: Packaging Style (was:You get to choose!) —Lou Zucaro

(...) USC? I don't think I'm up on my acronyms. It's not the cardboard itself that I mind, but the fact that the box can't be re-closed to contain the pieces inside. (...) Well, LEGO started it with the whole "Use this box for storage" deal on the (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: Packaging Style (was:You get to choose!) —Thomas Stangl

(...) The UCS sets are a rotten example. Whoever designed the UCS Tie and X-Wing boxes should be strangled, hanged, and SHOT. Those are the flimsiest, most useless boxes I've seen out of Lego. They are double the size they need to be (and at half (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

10018 & 10019 packed same as other UCS sets? (was:Packaging Style) —Jeremy Scott

The subject tells all. I ask this in light of 10018 and 19 being sent to stores. (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)

Re: 10018 & 10019 packed same as other UCS sets? (was:Packaging Style) —Daniel Crichton

"Jeremy Scott" <Copyright@cox.net> wrote in message news:GutMwL.BGv@lugnet.com... (...) The RBR from S@H is in the same style large flimsy box as the UCS sets. I doubt they'd change much going to retail. Does the retail version have a coloured (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.starwars)

Re: You get to choose! —Simon Bennett

Excellent stuff Jake, I shall be voting but... I do have one small cavil and I really hate to do it after you have put in so much work but there has still been no Technic Legend. Is this because Technic sets are so large that it is feared they would (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)

Re: You get to choose! —Ronald Vallenduuk

So I'm not the only one.... that's a bit of a relief. My two cents on the choice of five sets? I couldn't care less! Why are they all minifig sets again? My choices for legends: Constellation, what can I say? But it has to be with the original (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)

Re: You get to choose! —Ross Crawford

(...) At least they did re-release 8459 (as 8464). Though not a "legends" release, it certainly made me happy 8?) ROSCO (22 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)

Re: You get to choose! —David Schilling

(...) Unfortunately, it is no longer available. :-( I ordered a couple right when they came out, and just a few days ago wanted to order a couple more. No luck. That was too short a timespan to re-release this set, in my opinion. Oh well. We could (...) (22 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)

Re: You get to choose! —Brett Kingery

Oh the humanity! Oh the torture! How is one supposed to choose just one? Should I vote on which I would be more likely to buy? (375 Castle), which I would most like to have, but probably can't afford (6285 Black Seas Barracuda), which is most (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Bob Parker

(...) If the 6941 Battrax (<set:6941>) is not choosen the winner, I will be filing a lawsuit with the Florida State Attorney General's Office to contest the results of the voting. Then they will order the hand counting of all the votes and someone (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Jeremy Scott

(...) Old Joke. Very old joke. :^) (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Jeremy Scott

Wow! Because of LD, an amazing thing has happened this past day. We have the power to decide what LD puts out next. We've always placed messages in .lego.direct asking for whatever the heck we wanted, but now, we will actually get it. (Well sorta, (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Erin Windross

(...) Which one? Howie, AJ or Brian? ;) g,d,r (FUT .pun) -- Erin (22 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Mark Herzberg

(...) I totally agree! My voting experience sucked too, because while I had an obvious favourite (6390), I want them all. I have a funny feeling that we'll be seeing the four loosers in time for the holidays (and my money is on 6390 being the (...) (22 years ago, 16-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Bruce Hietbrink

Woo-hoo! FWIW, my thoughts on the choices: 1. Yellow Castle. This was my vote without hesitation. All bricks, no panels! This is true building. As the set that began the castle theme, this is a legend. I'm not worried about some changes as some have (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Larry Pieniazek

(...) I'm speculating but RBR was brought back under something a bit different than "LEGENDS" (it's a bit muddy exactly how it's organized to this reader). Also it was a lot more recent. Maybe they brought back RBR to test the waters and make the (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Legends in stores? —David Eaton

(...) So-- If I may ask, how are Legends doing as a product line? Are we likely to see "legends" in stores? Are the Wild West & Pirate sets currently in stores considered "legends"? I guess why I ask is that I'd much prefer them in stores. I hate to (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)

Re: Legends in stores? —Erin Windross

Ha, think you have problems? Try living in Canada and see the money we have to pay for S@H....at least you have Shop@Home as an affordable option... Oh well, when life gives you lemons, chuck 'em at somebody else and laugh ;) -- Erin (...) (22 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)

Re: Legends in stores? —Kevin Salm

(...) Legends are only available directly from Lego, as you know. The other re-issued Lego sets that ARE available from retailers are not Legends, but are classified as CLASSICS. That distinction seems to make all the difference. So, the re-issued (...) (22 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: Legends in stores? —Bruce Schlickbernd

(...) I suppose it is cold comfort if there isn't a Lego outlet store near you, but the Lego store in Anaheim (Downtown Disney, accessible without going into the park) carries the Legend line. They even got in the new Blacksmith Shop this week (...) (22 years ago, 14-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)

Re: Legends in stores? —Matt Hein

(...) Arrgh! Why doesn't Lego set up a direct shop in Arizona? I know they probably have them in California, NY, and near their corporate HQ, but It seems where I live, is the last place to get Lego at a decent price. :( If only Lego released Legend (...) (22 years ago, 14-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)

Re: Legends in stores? —Richard Marchetti

(...) I have the funny feeling that where you live gets GREAT sales if you know where to look and wait for the right moment to spring into action. I guess it depends on the population density of your particular town. I find good deals in places that (...) (22 years ago, 14-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)

Re: You get to choose! -> IBERIA? —Julián Guerrero Molina-Prados

(...) Ok, it´s wonderful. But why Spain and Portugal are off? Lego Direct doesn´t work at all in our countries, and sets heve been added every month... if the home service is launched, I am not going to have enough money to buy Sopwith Camel, Rebel (...) (22 years ago, 15-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! -> IBERIA? —

Jarid Lukin

Julián, Today is your lucky day... We're proud to announce the addition of Spain and Portugal as available shipping countries to Shop At Home online: (URL) Lukin Commerce Project Manager LEGO Direct (...) (22 years ago, 15-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! -> IBERIA? —Lindsay Frederick Braun

(...) This has to be the best "ask and ye shall receive" I've seen in a while! Kudos to LD! LFB (22 years ago, 15-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

RE: You get to choose! -> IBERIA? —Marco Correia

YES!!!!! =D I was feeling a bit frustrated, when I voted for the LEGO Legend and not beeing able to use Shop At Home online to buy the released set (if/when my elected set wins the Legend status). Now I'm happy :) THANKS! mc. PS: The only "part of (...) (22 years ago, 16-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! -> IBERIA? —Pedro Silva

OBRIGADO! :-) (Thank you very, very much!) This is a great day for us - shame I did not see this earlier... :-/ Anyway, thank you LEGO. It is nice to see you value our needs. My vows for the future: that the whole world can use this feature! Pedro (...) (22 years ago, 16-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! -> IBERIA? —Julián Guerrero Molina-Prados

(...) Oh thank you a lot. I am very sorry because of I have not the vocabulary to say what I feel; happy, in one word. Probably, my first set will be Sopwith Camel, wonderful sculpture. My wallet and my girlfriend are not as happy as I am :-D One (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

re:choose: ERROR SCREEN —Leonard Hoffman

I've tried to vote for the last four days and I keep getting an error screen that says there is something wrong with the website. what's up? thanks -Lenny Mckee-Hoffman (...) (22 years ago, 15-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: choose: ERROR SCREEN —Richard Frank Vendl II

Yeah, same here, what gives and does anybody know the current standings? I want to vote for Main Street! Signed, Rick LUGNET member #540 (...) (22 years ago, 16-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: choose: ERROR SCREEN —John Henry Kruer

(...) I doubt this is it- but on Lego's games part, (URL) has 'KIDS ONLY Like games? Take the survey!' as one of the buttons. It directs you to the general opinion part, in which games are a categorie. I wonder why kids only? I doubt this is (...) (22 years ago, 21-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: choose: ERROR SCREEN —Lou Zucaro

I was having this problem...I re-registered and the problem went away (although now I have two logins). My guess is there are some accounts in the system that are corrupted or missing certain data and therefore trigger the resulting error (probably (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —John Henry Kruer

(...) Since everybody else has, I'll give my opinion: I think this is great. We now have a chance to get great sets with highly inflated prices currently. I do not care if the castle or space helmet is slightly different; I do not think it matters. (...) (22 years ago, 17-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Re: You get to choose! —Kerry Raymond

(...) Memo To: Occupational Health and Safety, The Lego Group Subject: Unsafe Working Conditions in Lego Direct Problem: A number of recent projects undertaken in Lego Direct have resulted in reports of staff feeling light-headed. Apart from the (...) (22 years ago, 1-May-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)