|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford writes:
>
> And another pet hate is people who type an acronym, then write the meaning
> after it! Why not just leave the acronym out altogether?
>
> ROSCO
>
> LMKWYT (Let Me Know Wh....Oh, poop)
Okay, if attorneys general, courts martial and Rolls Royce are plural forms,
shouldn't the plural of AFOL be AF'sOL? Or are the rules different for
acronyms?
And speaking of acronyms, hasn't it already been argued that technically in
order to be an acronym the series of letters must form a word (usual example
being radar)? Or do they all form new words-- it's just that some of them are
impossible to pronounce?
Maggie C.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today
|
| (...) Never let it be said that a Strine[1] was adverse to a little "linguistic laziness", but in this case, it actually changes the entire meaning of the sentence. Most people know what is actually meant, but it just doesn't make sense to me, when (...) (24 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
85 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|