To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 9445
9444  |  9446
Subject: 
Re: Phrenetic Phonetics
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 8 Mar 2001 22:36:52 GMT
Viewed: 
1533 times
  
Dave Schuler at orrex@excite.com wrote:

> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mark Sandlin writes:
> > I follow the course of logic that:
> > 
> > Technical = (tek-nik-al)
> > 
> > and therefore,
> > 
> > Technic = (tek-nik)
> > 
> > I suspect people say (tek-neek) because they incorrectly think "technic" is
> > the correct spelling of the word "technique."
> 
> 8^)  Not me.  My first exposure to "Technic" was in the form of
> "Technics," pronounced "teck-neeks" by a salesperson at a stereo store.

Wow, another person who pronounces it wrong. :^P

I can't find anything in the dictionary that's spelled "Technic" and
pronounced (tek-neek)

~Grand Admiral Muffin Head
--
Mark's Lego(R) Creations
http://www.nwlink.com/~sandlin/lego



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Phrenetic Phonetics
 
(...) That's tres chic of you. 8^) Dave! FUT OT.Fun (26 years ago, 9-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Phrenetic Phonetics
 
(...) 8^) Not me. My first exposure to "Technic" was in the form of "Technics," pronounced "teck-neeks" by a salesperson at a stereo store. Dave! (26 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

85 Messages in This Thread:





























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR