Subject:
|
Re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 8 Mar 2001 16:53:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
272 times
|
| |
|
|
Ross Crawford at rcrawford@csi.com wrote:
> Aaarrrgh!! I don't know who decided "couldn't" should be shortened to "could"
> but it seems to have caught on.
>
> I suppose it's possible that you could care less - but I bet you meant you
> couldn't care less. Not that I have anything against yan^H^H^H americans, but
> you seem to quite regularly do awful things like this to the language.
That's a lovely sweeping generalization you have there.
However, I do share your complaint.
One of my LEGO-related complaints has to do with the fact that people say
"Technique" when they mean "Technic."
"Technique" = (tek-neek)
"Technic" = (tek-nik)
Thanks for your attention.
:^)
~Grand Admiral Muffin Head
--
Mark's Lego(R) Creations
http://www.nwlink.com/~sandlin/lego
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
85 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
