To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 9453
9452  |  9454
Subject: 
Re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 9 Mar 2001 01:53:46 GMT
Viewed: 
345 times
  
Hey,

Don't blame my country!

I'll accept full blame for my gramatical mistake! :)

The funny thing is that I'm usually the one correcting other people's
grammar at work!

Hmm - I guess I must have started using that phrase a long time ago and
nobody ever corrected me.  I bet I never used it in any formal writing at
school and work, so tha's why it has never been caught there.

I do have to grudgingly agree thought that Americans do tend butcher the
language a bit.

Ross Crawford <rcrawford@csi.com> wrote in message
news:G9v12z.5s1@lugnet.com...
In lugnet.general, Brad Hamilton writes:
I'm happy with the new way.  I do like to read people's comments, but its
fine to have to do an extra click.  I could care less about people who • own
the set, want the set, or want to sell it.

Aaarrrgh!! I don't know who decided "couldn't" should be shortened to • "could"
but it seems to have caught on.

I suppose it's possible that you could care less - but I bet you meant you
couldn't care less. Not that I have anything against yan^H^H^H americans, • but
you seem to quite regularly do awful things like this to the language.

ROSCO



Message has 1 Reply:
  Grammar vs Logic (was: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today)
 
(...) Apology accepted! It's just that Ive heard the phrase used hundreds (maybe thousands) of times, mostly on the 'net, always by Americans... (...) The phrase is actually gramatically correct - it's the logic that's incorrect! (...) Doesn't (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today
 
(...) Aaarrrgh!! I don't know who decided "couldn't" should be shortened to "could" but it seems to have caught on. I suppose it's possible that you could care less - but I bet you meant you couldn't care less. Not that I have anything against (...) (24 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

85 Messages in This Thread:





























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR