To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 9425
9424  |  9426
Subject: 
Re: NOT the Queen's English (was re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Thu, 8 Mar 2001 14:35:23 GMT
Viewed: 
308 times
  
Maggie Cambron wrote:

In lugnet.general, Ross Crawford writes:
In lugnet.general, Brad Hamilton writes:
I could care less about people who own the set, want the set, or want to sell
it.

Aaarrrgh!! I don't know who decided "couldn't" should be shortened to "could"
but it seems to have caught on.

I suppose it's possible that you could care less - but I bet you meant you
couldn't care less. Not that I have anything against yan^H^H^H americans, but
you seem to quite regularly do awful things like this to the language.

Hey, I resemble that nasturtium!  I'll have you know that I too cringe when I
hear that phrase (no offense, Brad!).  It also pains me that I have seen two
people on Lugnet who certainly should have known better write "between you and
I".  And while I'm at it "drug" is not a past tense of "drag"!  Since
"short-lived" means "having a short life", the correct pronunciation should be
obvious.

If I think of other examples I'll be more than happy share them-- can you tell
that I could care less about this topic?  A LOT less?

Maggie C. (tickled to have worked the word "nasturtium" into yet another post)

Check out what The American Heritage® Book of English Usage, A Practical
and Authoritative Guide to Contemporary English has to say about this
subject:

http://www.bartleby.com/64/C003/078.html

--
Thomas Main
main@appstate.edu



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: NOT the Queen's English (was re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today)
 
(...) Okay, they have a good argument, but I must say that I've heard the phrase uttered by a lot of people on whom (IMHO) sarcasm is wasted anyway, so that explanation is a bit of a stretch for me. Hey, and remember that song from long ago "Too (...) (23 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  NOT the Queen's English (was re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today)
 
(...) Hey, I resemble that nasturtium! I'll have you know that I too cringe when I hear that phrase (no offense, Brad!). It also pains me that I have seen two people on Lugnet who certainly should have known better write "between you and I". And (...) (23 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)

85 Messages in This Thread:





























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR