To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 9422
9421  |  9423
Subject: 
NOT the Queen's English (was re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Thu, 8 Mar 2001 06:33:11 GMT
Viewed: 
297 times
  
In lugnet.general, Ross Crawford writes:
In lugnet.general, Brad Hamilton writes:
I could care less about people who own the set, want the set, or want to sell
it.

Aaarrrgh!! I don't know who decided "couldn't" should be shortened to "could"
but it seems to have caught on.

I suppose it's possible that you could care less - but I bet you meant you
couldn't care less. Not that I have anything against yan^H^H^H americans, but
you seem to quite regularly do awful things like this to the language.

Hey, I resemble that nasturtium!  I'll have you know that I too cringe when I
hear that phrase (no offense, Brad!).  It also pains me that I have seen two
people on Lugnet who certainly should have known better write "between you and
I".  And while I'm at it "drug" is not a past tense of "drag"!  Since
"short-lived" means "having a short life", the correct pronunciation should be
obvious.

If I think of other examples I'll be more than happy share them-- can you tell
that I could care less about this topic?  A LOT less?

Maggie C. (tickled to have worked the word "nasturtium" into yet another post)



Message has 4 Replies:
  Re: NOT the Queen's English (was re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today)
 
(...) We'll show 'em! (...) Must've missed the other one(s), sorry 8?) (click,click,click....read....) Oh, there it is! (URL) Looks like a few other people like that one, too. Well I guess I've got one of your favourite words pinned down, not sure (...) (23 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
  Re: NOT the Queen's English (was re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today)
 
(...) Say on, sister! A particular gripe for me is "irregardless," which for some reason sees a lot of use in my office. Further, as I've mentioned before, I am thoroughly vexed by "nukuler" in place of "nuclear." I'm not sufficiently pedantic to (...) (23 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
  Re: NOT the Queen's English (was re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today)
 
(...) Check out what The American Heritage® Book of English Usage, A Practical and Authoritative Guide to Contemporary English has to say about this subject: (URL) Main main@appstate.edu (23 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
  Re: NOT the Queen's English (was re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today)
 
(...) Here's one that drives me BONKERS! *"All of a sudden."* What is a "sudden". And how does "all" of one cause something to occur quickly. What does "part of a sudden" do? (I looked it up - it is also a noun, but it still drives me crazy). Here's (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today
 
(...) Aaarrrgh!! I don't know who decided "couldn't" should be shortened to "could" but it seems to have caught on. I suppose it's possible that you could care less - but I bet you meant you couldn't care less. Not that I have anything against (...) (23 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

85 Messages in This Thread:





























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR