To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 1107
1106  |  1108
Subject: 
Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Tue, 9 Mar 1999 00:39:22 GMT
Viewed: 
386 times
  
On Sun, 7 Mar 1999 22:22:57 GMT, cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley)
wrote:

I would think that if you forced an airline employee to sign a receipt

_forced_ an airline employee? I think they'd be much happier to lose
your custom than to set _that_ precedent.

Jasper "flown twice in my life - there and back" Janssen



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
 
(...) I would think that if you forced an airline employee to sign a receipt for your luggage stating that it had none of those things that if you get it back with damage you can demonstrate that it wasn't nomral wear and tear YOU caused. A pipe (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

90 Messages in This Thread:







































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR