To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 679
678  |  680
Subject: 
Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 16 Mar 1999 10:19:48 GMT
Viewed: 
614 times
  
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999 12:54:22 GMT, jasper@janssen.dynip.com (Jasper Janssen)
wrote:

On Mon, 15 Mar 1999 11:27:58 GMT, legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K)
wrote:

On Mon, 15 Mar 1999 10:32:42 GMT, "Selçuk <teyyareci>"
<sgore@nospam.superonline.com> wrote:

from 6% (for vital sources like bread, basic food materials) up to 25%
(luxury(!) items, icluding things like home appliances,  and so).

So, I assume Lego is taxed at 6%?

Wanna bet?

Jasper "10 to 1" Janssen

No, but he did say 6% was for "vital sources".    It sounded logical to me. :-)

-- Terry K --



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
 
(...) You have yet to learn, then, that logic and taxes simply don't mix. Frex, $10, 200 gramme bars of chocolate are taxed as vital, too. Jasper (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
 
(...) Wanna bet? Jasper "10 to 1" Janssen (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

90 Messages in This Thread:







































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR