Subject:
|
Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Mar 1999 20:22:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
467 times
|
| |
|
|
Sorry if this is a double post. Sprintlink seems swamped today.
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> Oh, and I forgot to say... under MY definition, it wasn't privatization.
>
> Take your choice... your definition, and it's a success, or my
> definition, and it's not the thing in question. :-) Either way, I'm
> right. And that's all that matters, after all. :-)
Well, as long as you are changing the definitions of words to suit your
arguments, I can't counter you, so I guess you win.
There are two kinds of logic that can't be countered - impeccable and
unintelligible. By MY (aka the dictionary's) definitions of those
words, I know where your argument fits in. :-)
Naji
n (dot) norder (at) computer (dot) org
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
90 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
