To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 687
686  |  688
Subject: 
Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 18 Mar 1999 12:54:30 GMT
Viewed: 
519 times
  
On Tue, 16 Mar 1999 19:35:01 GMT, richard.dee@nospam.virgin.net
(Richard Dee) wrote:

Well, discriminatory, I don't know. All I know is my parents are
paying more as a result. 'Tis to pay for increased child
allowance(1). The married people pay for that tax allowance,
whether they have kids or not, want kids or not, had kids or
not!

Well, no, it's no longer getting something that is _only_ available to
a) married couples, and therefore, II), to heterosexual couples.

Not much difference between that and giving all blacks and/or
non-blacks a tax break.

Jasper



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
 
On Fri, 12 Mar 1999 23:05:21 GMT, Jasper Janssen uttered the following profundities... (...) Well, discriminatory, I don't know. All I know is my parents are paying more as a result. 'Tis to pay for increased child allowance(1). The married people (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

90 Messages in This Thread:







































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR