To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 687
686  |  688
Subject: 
Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 18 Mar 1999 12:54:30 GMT
Viewed: 
1603 times
  
On Tue, 16 Mar 1999 19:35:01 GMT, richard.dee@nospam.virgin.net
(Richard Dee) wrote:

> Well, discriminatory, I don't know. All I know is my parents are
> paying more as a result. 'Tis to pay for increased child
> allowance(1). The married people pay for that tax allowance,
> whether they have kids or not, want kids or not, had kids or
> not!

Well, no, it's no longer getting something that is _only_ available to
a) married couples, and therefore, II), to heterosexual couples.

Not much difference between that and giving all blacks and/or
non-blacks a tax break.

Jasper



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
 
On Fri, 12 Mar 1999 23:05:21 GMT, Jasper Janssen uttered the following profundities... (...) Well, discriminatory, I don't know. All I know is my parents are paying more as a result. 'Tis to pay for increased child allowance(1). The married people (...) (28 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

90 Messages in This Thread:







































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR