Subject:
|
Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Sun, 7 Mar 1999 22:22:57 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
CJC@saynotospamNEWSGUY.COM
|
Viewed:
|
607 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote:
> Yes, but dirt, wet, straps torn off, scratches, or rips in the material
> are all "normal wear and tear", so, **essentially**, no.
I would think that if you forced an airline employee to sign a receipt
for your luggage stating that it had none of those things that if you
get it back with damage you can demonstrate that it wasn't nomral wear
and tear YOU caused.
A pipe dream, probably.
--
Unofficial listing of weekly US Lego Shop at Home phone specials
http://www.lugnet.com/lsahs/
800-835-4386 (S@H USA) / 800-267-5346 (S@H Canada)
www.lugnet.com/news/ - Meet more LEGO fans in your area through LUGNET
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
|
| (...) Yes, but dirt, wet, straps torn off, scratches, or rips in the material are all "normal wear and tear", so, **essentially**, no. (26 years ago, 7-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
90 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
