Subject:
|
Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 13 Mar 1999 22:12:35 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
LPIEN@IWANTNOSPAM.CTP.ihatespamCOM
|
Viewed:
|
505 times
|
| |
|
|
<36E74AC3.DF4ABBA2@voyager.net> <36E82620.D84B40F3@computer.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Well, OK, I was being a little flippant, but my argument boils down to
this:
It WAS a successful privatization. UT food service SHOULD be
de-monopolized, and then maybe it would be viewed as a success by the
non-customers (of the privatization) that have to buy their food there,
too, as well as by the greedy bastard government officials who are
happily sticking it to the UT students.
But if you go around calling it an "unsuccessful" privatization, you're
as declued as the media. You seem relatively bright, so you're not going
to do that any more, are you?
--
Larry Pieniazek http://my.voyager.net/lar
FDIC Know your Customer is wounded, thanks to you, but not dead...
See http://www.defendyourprivacy.com for details
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
90 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
