To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 1149
1148  |  1150
Subject: 
Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Fri, 12 Mar 1999 08:01:06 GMT
Viewed: 
2012 times
  
The best idea I've heard yet for calming down the anxieties of airports!  First
airport in line PLEASE be Detroit!!!  With a separate cleaning staff, only for
that room... so it might get done.  Sorry.

I'd been trying to figure out how my whimpering post about two sets turned into a
debate on privatization... now I know!

Beth

Richard Dee wrote:

> On Mon, 8 Mar 1999 04:34:02 GMT, Larry Pieniazek uttered the following
> profundities...
> > Tom McDonald wrote:
> 
> 
> What must be done to mitigate the issue of  hubs would be to
> have a massive Lego building room in each terminal, and some
> of the best Lego shopping opportunities known to man. That way,
> at least the AFOL's would look forward to going through the
> "fortress" hubs, so that they can take an hour or so and build
> a fortress of their own!
> 



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
 
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999 04:34:02 GMT, Larry Pieniazek uttered the following profundities... (...) How true. The airports sell a system to the airlines, extolling the virtues of its wonderful new technology. It fails frequently, is usually designed for (...) (28 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

90 Messages in This Thread:







































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR