To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 1149
1148  |  1150
Subject: 
Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Fri, 12 Mar 1999 08:01:06 GMT
Viewed: 
701 times
  
The best idea I've heard yet for calming down the anxieties of airports!  First
airport in line PLEASE be Detroit!!!  With a separate cleaning staff, only for
that room... so it might get done.  Sorry.

I'd been trying to figure out how my whimpering post about two sets turned into a
debate on privatization... now I know!

Beth

Richard Dee wrote:

On Mon, 8 Mar 1999 04:34:02 GMT, Larry Pieniazek uttered the following
profundities...
Tom McDonald wrote:


What must be done to mitigate the issue of  hubs would be to
have a massive Lego building room in each terminal, and some
of the best Lego shopping opportunities known to man. That way,
at least the AFOL's would look forward to going through the
"fortress" hubs, so that they can take an hour or so and build
a fortress of their own!




Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
 
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999 04:34:02 GMT, Larry Pieniazek uttered the following profundities... (...) How true. The airports sell a system to the airlines, extolling the virtues of its wonderful new technology. It fails frequently, is usually designed for (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

90 Messages in This Thread:







































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR