Subject:
|
Re: What about the first?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 28 May 2004 16:40:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2637 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Don Heyse wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
| |
for assidious and malintentioned nitpickers to find.
|
If you are going to insult me, please at least check your spelling first;
Don has to look these “big words” up in his pocket dictionary! ;-)
|
I use google, and you’re right, I did need to look up the first biggie.
Unfortunately the top link from google didn’t help much:
definition of assidious
Or maybe that was sneaky debator’s trick for calling someone an insidious @$$
and passing it off as a typo? You guys are too clever for me. :^)
|
Wow, you folks are sensitive. I thought the typo and the bizare link from
google were kinda funny. I even added a smiley to go with the winky, but
lugnet squashed my attempt to set FUT to .fun. Gotta figure out how to
do that.
Anyhow, the only reason I’m in here is because .debate is so depressing
lately. You guys are a bunch of downers. Lighten up a bit and I’ll go
back to lurking and learning.
Don
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: What about the first?
|
| (...) I use google, and you're right, I did need to look up the first biggie. Unfortunately the top link from google didn't help much: (URL) of assidious> Or maybe that was sneaky debator's trick for calling someone an insidious @$$ and passing it (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
91 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
