Subject:
|
Re: What about the first?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 19 Feb 2003 19:18:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1934 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Fredrik Glöckner writes:
> > > > The truth is that you don't have to be perfect to recognize (or
> > > > condemn) evil.
> > >
> > >
> > > "Let he who is free from sin cast the first stone."
> >
> > So what are you trying to argue here? That *nobody* is worthy to confront
> > evil? That *nobody* has the moral authority to rise up against tyrants,
> > depots, or dictators? That *nobody* has the right to judge anyone else?
> >
> > I don't understand your implication.
>
>
> I think he is simply asking for a little humility to be shown.
But what does that mean? Humility is irrelevant. Your obfuscation is a dodge.
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: What about the first?
|
| (...) When someone observed to Winston Churchill that his predecessor as prime minister, Neville Chamberlain, was a humble man, Churchill is reported to have replied, "And he has so much to be humble about." Ditto for some current European leaders (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
91 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
