To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 19069
19068  |  19070
Subject: 
Re: What about the first?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:25:13 GMT
Viewed: 
1618 times
  
The truth is that you don't have to be perfect to recognize (or
condemn) evil.


    "Let he who is free from sin cast the first stone."


Fredrik
--
http://folk.uio.no/fredrigl/technic/



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: What about the first?
 
(...) "Eh... All right. Two points, ah, two flats, and a packet of gravel." ;-) Scott A (...) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: What about the first?
 
(...) So what are you trying to argue here? That *nobody* is worthy to confront evil? That *nobody* has the moral authority to rise up against tyrants, depots, or dictators? That *nobody* has the right to judge anyone else? I don't understand your (...) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: What about the first?
 
(...) Arrgg. This kind of moral equivalency is probably the most aggravating characteristic of the Left. To be unable to distinguish between being morally good and evil is *basic*! Dave, you sound silly when you call Bush or Blair "bad", but call (...) (21 years ago, 18-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

91 Messages in This Thread:



























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR