To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 19074
19073  |  19075
Subject: 
Re: What about the first?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:10:37 GMT
Viewed: 
3484 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Fredrik Glöckner writes:
> > >  The truth is that you don't have to be perfect to recognize (or
> > >  condemn) evil.
> > 
> > 
> >    "Let he who is free from sin cast the first stone."
> 
> So what are you trying to argue here?  That *nobody* is worthy to confront
> evil?  That *nobody* has the moral authority to rise up against tyrants,
> depots, or dictators?  That *nobody* has the right to judge anyone else?
> 
> I don't understand your implication.


I think he is simply asking for a little humility to be shown.

Scott A



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: What about the first?
 
(...) But what does that mean? Humility is irrelevant. Your obfuscation is a dodge. JOHN (24 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: What about the first?
 
(...) So what are you trying to argue here? That *nobody* is worthy to confront evil? That *nobody* has the moral authority to rise up against tyrants, depots, or dictators? That *nobody* has the right to judge anyone else? I don't understand your (...) (24 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

91 Messages in This Thread:



























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR