To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 19087
19086  |  19088
Subject: 
Re: What about the first?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 19 Feb 2003 22:22:09 GMT
Viewed: 
1164 times
  
Perhaps this will help you understand my postion a little better. On a scale
of
1 to 10, 10 being the best and 1 being the worst.  The US invading Iraq
without
the support of the UN would be a 3. Nuking the entire Earth would be a 2.
Doing
nothing would be a 1.


Utter obliteration is better than allowing a petty dictator to exist?  Words
fail me.

I think you misunderstood me. By "doing nothing" I don't mean about just
Saddam. I mean every dictator, even the ones the US is friendly toward. Untill
all of the people of the world are free from tyranny, (including but not
limited to US and Israeli tyranny as well, Scott) there will never be world
peace. We could stick our head in the sand and pretend that the 'bad people'
don't exist, but until we (the collective we, as in anyone who values freedom)
do something nothing will ever change for the better. I happen to think freedom
is worth fighting for. If that makes me a crazy war-monger in some people's
eyes then so be it.

-->Bruce<--

"Where's Major Petrucelli?"
"Yeeeeee-HAAAAAAAAA!"

I am curious as to what that is in reference to.

-Mike Petrucelli



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: What about the first?
 
(...) I don't see how obliterating everything helps those under dictatorships. I also don't see the point in risking what freedom we have to help people who don't want it or can't maintain it. I think you statement goes way beyond Patrick Henry's. (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: What about the first?
 
(...) One can point to individuals in both parties in letting Enron go wild, but it really was the baby of the Republicans. Bush loved 'em. As to the oft-repeated but inaccurate claims that the environmentalists had somehow blocked construction of (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

91 Messages in This Thread:



























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR