To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 24090
24089  |  24091
Subject: 
Re: What about the first?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms
Followup-To: 
lugnet.admin.terms
Date: 
Fri, 28 May 2004 12:56:52 GMT
Viewed: 
9255 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:

(snip)

I explained what happened, I admitted fault, and I apologised for it.

If it doesn't fit the format of the apology you want, or doesn't fit the facts
as you imagine them to be, tough. Take it or leave it.

YOU would be well served to review *this* post
http://news.lugnet.com/admin/terms/?n=438
which, I note, is a direct reply to the post you cited.

Internalise it.

I've done *far* more than I need to here. Stop baiting me about this.

In fact, stop baiting me about anything at all, as your baiting only proves, to
everyone with any sense that you are low value add, especially when you carry
out vendettas like this.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: What about the first?
 
(...) Is this really the best explanation you can come up with after 15 months? That is not how it (URL) looks>. It looks like you tried to pass someone else's words off as your own (plagiarism) and infringed their IP rights in the process. Read (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

91 Messages in This Thread:



























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR