| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
(snip)
I explained what happened, I admitted fault, and I apologised for it.
If it doesn't fit the format of the apology you want, or doesn't fit the facts
as you imagine them to be, tough. Take it or leave it.
YOU would be well served to review *this* post
http://news.lugnet.com/admin/terms/?n=438
which, I note, is a direct reply to the post you cited.
Internalise it.
I've done *far* more than I need to here. Stop baiting me about this.
In fact, stop baiting me about anything at all, as your baiting only proves, to
everyone with any sense that you are low value add, especially when you carry
out vendettas like this.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: What about the first?
|
| (...) Is this really the best explanation you can come up with after 15 months? That is not how it (URL) looks>. It looks like you tried to pass someone else's words off as your own (plagiarism) and infringed their IP rights in the process. Read (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
91 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
