Subject:
|
Re: What about the first?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 18 Feb 2003 18:37:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1472 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
<snip>
> > The assumption one state is sponsoring/allowing such fundamentalists to
> > exist in their territory can not become "casus belli", otherwise every
> > single state on Earth would become a target (and paradoxally none would have
> > the legitimacy to attack it!)
> > You're just entering the fanatics game when you want to destroy the country
> > that supports them.
>
> The US has *no* intention of destroying Iraq, but merely deposing Saddam.
> Unfortunatley, it will take war to accomplish this.
or 10 years and he'll die of natural causes--no war needed.
<snip>
> JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: What about the first?
|
| (...) <snip> (...) It's not that I have a problem with religious fanatics, it's what those fanatics *do*. I would venture that 90% of the world's terrorism is perpetrated by Muslim fanatics. (...) The US has *no* intention of destroying Iraq, but (...) (22 years ago, 18-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
91 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
