Subject:
|
Re: What about the first?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 28 May 2004 14:31:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2647 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
| |
for assidious and malintentioned nitpickers to find.
|
If you are going to insult me, please at least check your spelling first;
Don has to look these “big words” up in his pocket dictionary! ;-)
|
I use google, and you’re right, I did need to look up the first biggie.
Unfortunately the top link from google didn’t help much:
definition of assidious
Or maybe that was sneaky debator’s trick for calling someone an insidious @$$
and passing it off as a typo? You guys are too clever for me. :^)
Don
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: What about the first?
|
| (...) are you an assiduous and malintentioned nitpicker? If not, I wasn't talking to you Scott, apologies if you think I was, but therefore I wasn't insulting you. If you are, then, by your own admission, identifying you as such isn't an insult, (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: What about the first?
|
| (...) Wow, you folks are sensitive. I thought the typo and the bizare link from google were kinda funny. I even added a smiley to go with the winky, but lugnet squashed my attempt to set FUT to .fun. Gotta figure out how to do that. Anyhow, the only (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: What about the first?
|
| (...) Is this really the best explanation you can come up with after 15 months? That is not how it (URL) looks>. It looks like you tried to pass someone else's words off as your own (plagiarism) and infringed their IP rights in the process. Read (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
91 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
