To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 19030
19029  |  19031
Subject: 
Re: What about the first?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 15 Feb 2003 04:30:19 GMT
Viewed: 
699 times
  
The only
thing we can do is make sure it happens on our terms. Why in the heck would • we
wait till after he has the ability to nuke half the world?

Is that really a risk?

Are you kidding me?  The whole rest of that was completely irrelevant if you
don't see this.

Scott A

-Mike Petrucelli



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: What about the first?
 
(...) Right now he does not have the nukes, and he does not have a conventional delivery system. He is a long way from getting them... and he is getting weaker by the day. So, what risk does he pose? What risk does he pose to world peace & security (...) (21 years ago, 16-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: What about the first?
 
(...) They did not "occupy" the Rhineland - it was already part of Germany. (...) Would AH have violated the treaty if he thought he'd be repelled? Can SH get the same level of public support AH got? Did you read the text I quoted? See: ==+== (...) (21 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

91 Messages in This Thread:



























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR