In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> I found this link on Little Gamers (http://www.little-gamers.com/) and it bugs
> me a bit... because I think they're right.
>
> http://www.counterpunch.org/cloughley05152004.html
>
> You know I've ranted against the Patriot Act before. Nothing has changed my
> opinion. It's bad through and through.
It's freaking enormous! And it uses a lot of big words too.
What I'm wondering is, assuming you haven't read the whole act,
what makes you trust an interpretation that immediately invokes that
meme you mentioned a short while back? Can you point to one that
doesn't invoke the meme, but says basically the same thing? How
about this?
I found this link on Little Gamers ((URL) and it bugs me a bit... because I think they're right. (URL) know I've ranted against the Patriot Act before. Nothing has changed my opinion. It's bad through and through. 1 - re the "losing" comment... read (...) (20 years ago, 27-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
