Subject:
|
Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 1 Aug 2003 16:50:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1071 times
|
| |
| |
Mandatory life sentences create very dangerous, panicked offenders.
If you were DUI and killed someone, and you KNEW that you were guaranteed a life
sentence, what exactly do you lose in trying to run, possibly killing more people
(think a DUI hitting a pedestrian, which happens a lot - the car is usually quite
drivable afterwards)?
I could see a mandatory 10-20 year sentence for a death, allowing up to life, but a
mandatory life? Uh-uh.
John wrote:
> > But again, if someone else loves those varied sensations it's not my
> > business.
>
> Fine. I can agree with you. But until you address the problem of:
>
> 1. What happens to a person who becomes a homeless junkie,
> 2. What happens to a person when they kill someone while driving "high"?
>
> I would suggest that we begin jailing drunk drivers 1 year MANDATORY with NO
> chance of parole, and MANDATORY LIFE sentences for drunk drivers who kill. If
> that has a "sobering" effect on alcohol use then I might consider us ready to
> legalize the other stuff (with the same penalties in effect).
>
> [JOHN]
--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
73 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|