Subject:
|
Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 24 Jul 2003 16:03:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
301 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli wrote:
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
Right so even that article said the 16-year-old kid broke into his home.
If your old enough to commit the crime your old enough get shot for it. I
for one would not let someone survive breaking into my home regardless of
which direction their facing. I am not stupid enough to risk my life by
shouting freeze. Of course I would just as easily shove a sword through
said persons throat as shoot them. I dont know maybe people just dont get
the concept of kill or be killed.
-Mike Petrucelli
|
Nice. Burgler != killer.
So the kill or be killed application does not apply.
Sure you dont know the intention of said burgler, but because he broke one
law doesnt immediately mean he s going to commit murder.
|
Well I certainly will not risk my life to try and find out first. If a person
breaks into my house I will assume the worst and act accordingly.
|
If we justified killing someone because they broke the law, eeveryone that
passes me on the highway would forfeit thier lives to your sword.
And stealing a 200 dollar TV does not warrant a death sentence in either of
our two contries.
The inherent violence in the system. And you wonder why youre labelled as a
bunch of gun toting yahoos.
|
No, I wonder how people can be so pacifistic when it comes to their lives and
property.
-Mike Petrucelli
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
73 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|