To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 21780
21779  |  21781
Subject: 
Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 1 Aug 2003 17:11:48 GMT
Viewed: 
1105 times
  
"Tom Stangl, VFAQman" wrote:

Mandatory life sentences create very dangerous, panicked offenders.

If you were DUI and killed someone, and you KNEW that you were guaranteed a life
sentence, what exactly do you lose in trying to run, possibly killing more people
(think a DUI hitting a pedestrian, which happens a lot - the car is usually quite
drivable afterwards)?

I could see a mandatory 10-20 year sentence for a death, allowing up to life, but a
mandatory life?  Uh-uh.

This is an incredibly important consideration that the pro-Death Penalty
and lock-em-up-and-throw-the-key-away people tend to totally ignore.

There are a few things that do justify indefinite incarceration, but
very few in my mind, for just this reason.

What we need are effective forms of rehabilitation, and good ways to
identify hopeless cases (given a good enough way to identify hopeless
cases, I would even support a limited death penalty).

One Oregon county really lacks a clue on rehabilitation. They refuse to
give parolees help in finding housing. They also don't let the parolees
leave the county. They also don't allow tents on the parking lot that
they expect any parolee who fails to find housing in the county to live
in. What a recipe for recidivism (of course I sense a certain sick
desire on some of the leuattka people to see parolees violate parole so
they can justify ever harsher sentences - heck, why don't we make it
easy and just use the death penalty for all crimes, afterall, anyone who
commits a crime is obviously not fit to be a citizen, and hey, to not
waste nature's investment in the body, let's harvest 'em for organs
(1)).

Frank

(1) Extra points for being the first to identify the SF reference I'm
thinking of here...



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals!
 
(...) Brown Girl in the Ring? Anyway, William Burroughs wrote an essay on this very idea in the late 70s or early 80s -- it was carried in Heavy Metal magazine. It loosely relates to his novel as screenplay, "Blade Runner." -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals!
 
(...) One reference that would seem to fit your Libertarian philosophy is Michael G. Coney's "The Jaws That Bite, The Claws that Catch." But I don't think that's the one you're referring to. Dave! (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals!
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz wrote: <snip> (...) I say it's LEXX :) (21 years ago, 5-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals!
 
Mandatory life sentences create very dangerous, panicked offenders. If you were DUI and killed someone, and you KNEW that you were guaranteed a life sentence, what exactly do you lose in trying to run, possibly killing more people (think a DUI (...) (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

73 Messages in This Thread:

















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR